WiggyRuss
Well-Known Member
wrong.Nope.
It was always within context of trying to keep LeBron.
How could they trade Garland to keep LeBron when LeBron was already gone?
That is not what I said.
you said that what the Cavs were building was just mediocre- so they should deal Garland and Sexton for picks- because picks at least had a chance on becoming high level players- when it was clear to you Sexton and Garland were not that.
Id be more than happy to find it for you if you insist on it.