1969 & 1996 Five HOFers MLB Draft : CHAT

[Nosferatu]

Before we get started, should we include Bonds and Clemens as HOFers?

 

[Shanemansj13]

Before we get started, should we include Bonds and Clemens as HOFers?

I'm good either way.

 

[Nosferatu]

Before we get started, should we include Bonds and Clemens as HOFers?

@UK Cowboy @blstoker @Pack 500 @Ritzarmy @MilkSpiller22 @wlk3 @femurov @Mebert @CitySushi

 

[blstoker]

Well using the draft order generator it put me first, I hate when it does that but you guys yelled at me last time I didn't put me first so here's the draft order.

1. Nos
2. Shane
3. UK
4. 500
5. Stoke
6. WLK
7. Sushi
8. Femur
9. Milk
10. Ritz
11. Meebs

I'll trade you my 5's $ 7's for your 1's and 11's

 

[blstoker]

Before we get started, should we include Bonds and Clemens as HOFers?

If we do then you gotta add the others who would certainly be in if not for cheating. Rose, McGwire, Sosa, etc.

 

[Nosferatu]

If we do then you gotta add the others who would certainly be in if not for cheating. Rose, McGwire, Sosa, etc.

I'm fine either way, I want to know what everyone else wants.

 

[UK Cowboy]

No

@UK Cowboy @blstoker @Pack 500 @Ritzarmy @MilkSpiller22 @wlk3 @femurov @Mebert @CitySushi

 

[blstoker]

I'm fine either way, I want to know what everyone else wants.

I get that, and I really don't care - but it's just that if we do it for just these two, then there's a laundry list of players who were as good or better than a lot of HoFers.

 

[Shanemansj13]

I'm fine either way, I want to know what everyone else wants.

No. Too many other guys to add to the list as well.

 

[Nosferatu]

I get that, and I really don't care - but it's just that if we do it for just these two, then there's a laundry list of players who were as good or better than a lot of HoFers.

Ok, so no it is...

 

[blstoker]

Ok, so no it is...

Sorry, if I'm long winded....

 

[Nosferatu]

Sorry, if I'm long winded....

Not at all I agree with you, where do we draw the line?

 

[UK Cowboy]

I get that, and I really don't care - but it's just that if we do it for just these two, then there's a laundry list of players who were as good or better than a lot of HoFers.

ThIs is why I said no

 

[blstoker]

ThIs is why I said no

Yeah, though the two in question are gonna be top picks, there are plenty in the same situation that nearly everyone can get a HoF talent without spending a HoF pick.

 

[UK Cowboy]

Not at all I agree with you, where do we draw the line?

Don't make one. If you take away all of the best players, the draft becomes lopsided to the guys picking at the bottom. I know if you take away the top 10 non HOF and make the first 20 picks basically the same guy, I'd rather have 10-11 than 1

 

[Shanemansj13]

I was hoping Bonds would fall to me

 

[blstoker]

I was hoping Bonds would fall to me

I was thinking - maybe Bonds should be a HoFer.....

 

[Shanemansj13]

I was thinking - maybe Bonds should be a HoFer.....

Lets all vote Bonds a HOFer now since Nos picked

 

[CitySushi]

Seriously you guys couldn't at least give me Barry Bonds? I quit.

 

[Nosferatu]

Seriously you guys couldn't at least give me Barry Bonds? I quit.

@wlk3 is that you???