Stokes1931
Fan
- 22,636
- 4,759
- 293
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2010
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
5-26 in their last 31 games on the road
That is '62 Mets level bad
That is '62 Mets level bad
So apparently washed up veterans CAN have bounce backs. All this season I thought it wasn't the case. Whoa.Wow! Heyward has really turned his career around with the Dodgers, hitting for average and power.
I know cal doesn't like the comparison, but this has shades of 2016. Yes, that team was better (they actually made the playoffs, barely) but there are some strong parallels. Both cratered badly after good first halves. Heck, this year's squad was playing so well at one point that they had a 95 win projection, if I remember correctly. And that is pretty impressive considering April.5-26 in their last 31 games on the road
That is '62 Mets level bad
LOLFlowers pops to 2nd on a pitch at his eyeballs.
Still, the team seems to be playing like it matters. I was expecting them to be blown out.
Hat tip to the opposing pitcher.7-2
Yaz 0-3 with 3 K's (15 K's as a team)
Alexander should not be back next season. He has been terrible
So apparently washed up veterans CAN have bounce backs. All this season I thought it wasn't the case. Whoa.
Guys, this 2-7 loss isn't completely bad. Sure, it was against the Dodgers. And yes, our old friend Shelby Miller won the game against us. Oh, and yes, this pushes us closer to official elimination. But y'all, Max Muncy went 0 for 4! Isn't that better than a win!?!?
The ‘16 team was the best team in the Bigs pre-ASB and tied for the worst in the Bigs post-ASB. That was a VERY good team where SOMETHING happened (there have been hints that SOMETHING happened, but no leaks). The ‘23 team played over their heads for about 2 months, and even that only got them to a ”95 win projection”. I will grant that their bad might not be their real level, but I believe the bad is more truthful than the good.I know cal doesn't like the comparison, but this has shades of 2016. Yes, that team was better (they actually made the playoffs, barely) but there are some strong parallels. Both cratered badly after good first halves. Heck, this year's squad was playing so well at one point that they had a 95 win projection, if I remember correctly. And that is pretty impressive considering April.
Both looked a lot better going into the All-Star break than what the end of season product looked like. This year's team wasn't going to be that bad, right? I don't think any of us envisioned this kind of skid (except maybe Hangman).The ‘16 team was the best team in the Bigs pre-ASB and tied for the worst in the Bigs post-ASB. That was a VERY good team where SOMETHING happened (there have been hints that SOMETHING happened, but no leaks). The ‘23 team played over their heads for about 2 months, and even that only got them to a ”95 win projection”. I will grant that their bad might not be their real level, but I believe the bad is more truthful than the good.
Imho, the only similarities are that there was a mid season crash. But that’s it.Both looked a lot better going into the All-Star break than what the end of season product looked like. This year's team wasn't going to be that bad, right? I don't think any of us envisioned this kind of skid (except maybe Hangman).