calsnowskier
Sarcastic F-wad
And who says we wouldn't fap to your dangling, lifeless corpse?Why, you need something to masturbate to?
And who says we wouldn't fap to your dangling, lifeless corpse?Why, you need something to masturbate to?
And who says we wouldn't fap to your dangling, lifeless corpse?
Why do we bother with it? C'mon now, you can reason it through.I have already stated I am all for the court system. I have also stated a change I would like made personally. Not sure what you are getting at.
Cool...was I correct though? You are a liberal. You are anti-death penalty and pro-abortion. You have already admitted to not serving.
The military has rules for PA purposes.
While I agree it has gotten a bit TOO political, the subject of the show is directly about these topics. I think the discussion is totally on topic.Shit, when did the PF leak all over this bitch?![]()
Why, you need something to masturbate to?
Asking how their morality relates to their world is totally within the scope, but IMO bringing it to OUR world and fighting over the use of one word or another isn't, but we can agree to disagree and I'll just slide back into the background....While I agree it has gotten a bit TOO political, the subject of the show is directly about these topics. I think the discussion is totally on topic.
I wasnt trying to slap you down. Just adding MHO to the subjectAsking how their morality relates to their world is totally within the scope, but IMO bringing it to OUR world and fighting over the use of one word or another isn't, but we can agree to disagree and I'll just slide back into the background....
View attachment 102394
Why do we bother with what? Death penalty works very well as a deterrent. How is the drug issue in Singapore? Capital punishment works.
Well, had you served, you would know PA is public affairs. Before you try to act smart, you may want to be sure you are not being a dumb ass. Rules of Engagement exist for diplomatic reasons within the public realm. Rules of Engagement endanger the lives of those serving and are a hindrance to winning. The last time we said fuck public opinion, we won the war...ended it with two dropped bombs. That is the last war we won and we never lost before that.
And why do they have 'public affairs?'
If they endanger soldiers and are a hindrance to winning, then why do they have them?
If winning at any cost is all that matters, then asymmetrical warfare and civilian targets are smart plays in your book, right?
Because of bleeding heart liberals.
Civilian targets....no...collateral damage....yes
So...I've been reading a few articles about the finale (carefully side-stepping spoilers), and the consensus is...
... @mr.hockey4242 is correct.
And that is all I'm going to say.