- Thread starter
- #1
noonthirtyjoe
tool
Do you guys think its time to move Long to LT. I do.
Not yet... let's see what type of Offense they run first. If it's a zone blocking scheme, with play action and moving pocket- I say keep him where he is. Bushrod had a down year- but he's still there for a few more years. And again- WHO replaces him?
well, if your asking who could replace long at G, the 7th pick in the second round should land a quality guard prospect normally.
I'm against it tbh. Rather draft a tackle at 7 and move bushrod to RT than move long.
Long+Bushrod on the right side would be rather nice(Bushrod's contract not being taken into account).
Not sure what you are asking me. But I know out LT sucks and we need to do something. I watched that show the blindside and Sandra Bullock says so too. So it's not just me.OK noon,,,,,,,so what happen if they takes place and it crashes around the feet of the new regime
Not sure what you are asking me. But I know out LT sucks and we need to do something. I watched that show the blindside and Sandra Bullock says so too. So it's not just me.
Very true. Most want their best lineman at LT. Krommer wanted his at G. Why would we not want Long to move? I thought that was the plan from day one.The answer to this depends somewhat on who the O coordinator is.
I have no plan B. I have no plans at all. Long is our best and that usually means moving to LT. The harm to me is we mess up a good thing, but the upside is we get a dominate LT protecting Cuttys blind side. Our current LT leads the league in giving up QB hurries. Would you feel better with a rook at LT over Long? Is the right thing to groom Long as we did then switch him. IDK but I do know we need a new LT.What I'm asking you is if you believe this is the right plan of attack what is your plan b? Of course if it fails what harm is it to you? I just don't think it's automate moving Long to left tackle. I could be wrong
What would you like to happen at LT then NCC.No, I do not.