commanders off season thread 2023

[kbso83432]

 

[skinsdad62]

 

[countryroads316]

Needed depth we don't even know if Mathis will be ready

 

[countryroads316]

I think Foster Moreau could be an interesting tightend if they would sign him

 

[Stymietee]

So we’re in a world where 35-41 plus 4 teams in 4 years is better than 12-11 in 2 years. Wondering if it’s because 1 is a black qb and the other is a white qb. Are we really that woke at this point, We’re really ready to accept losing to be pc

That's NOT what "woke" means! (losing actually means NOT being "woke!)

 

[countryroads316]

Would this be a good trade swap 1sts with the Bengals and Washington receives a 2nd and Jonah Williams

Bengals- 16th pick

Washington- 29th pick a 2nd and LT Jonah Williams

 

[kbso83432]

 

[skinsdad62]

That's NOT what "woke" means! (losing actually means NOT being "woke!)

View attachment 323766

That’s the leftist version

 

[skinsdad62]

Would this be a good trade swap 1sts with the Bengals and Washington receives a 2nd and Jonah Williams

Bengals- 16th pick

Washington- 29th pick a 2nd and LT Jonah Williams

Does the contract fit the cap ?

 

[Darrell Green Fan]

So we’re in a world where 35-41 plus 4 teams in 4 years is better than 12-11 in 2 years. Wondering if it’s because 1 is a black qb and the other is a white qb. Are we really that woke at this point, We’re really ready to accept losing to be pc

Has nothing to do with race or woke. Anyone who uses a won/loss record to evaluate a QB is not being accurate because there are so many other factors in play. Is a pitcher with a 9-4 record who enjoyed enormous run support and great defensive play but had an ERA of 7.23 and a WHIP of 2.7 really better than a pitcher with a 6-7 record who played on a bad team with bad defense and little run support but had an ERA of 4.01 and a WHIP of 1.27? Of course not, that would be idiotic.

 

[Stymietee]

That’s the leftist version

There are no, zero, nada versional definitions of words on earth left or right, ONLY misrepresentations of the same, otherwise, they are meaningless!

 

[skinsdad62]

All the win / loss crap being on the qb is just caveman talk and except when KC is brought up then it’s all about wins .

HOF qb sonny jurgensen had a career losing record . Joe Namath I believe did as well or around 500

matt Stafford won a superbowl with the rams but he also has a career losing record

JB has a losing record because the teams he was on weren’t very good . I think JB is a decent qb , but he needs a team around him to succeed in terms of winning .

 

[skinsdad62]

There are no, zero, nada versional definitions of words on earth left or right, ONLY misrepresentations of the same, otherwise, they are meaningless!

That dictionary went leftist years ago . Ask a person on the right what woke means and it’s completely different

 

[Stymietee]

That dictionary went leftist years ago . Ask a person on the right what woke means and it’s completely different

It's a dictionary and like every other dictionary, consistent in how words contained in it are universally defined. BTW; using your own reference to persons on the right, why would someone with an average IQ score of 141 defer to others with a collective score ranging between 61 and 100 on scale?

To further illustrate my point...

Among conservatives, "woke" has been adopted as term of derision for those who hold progressive social justice views. In particular, the word's right-wing connotation implies a "woke" person or entity is being performative or phony.

This is NOT a definition... just a misrepresentation of the word for political gain among those who are too lazy to research it for themselves.

 

[skinsdad62]

It's a dictionary and like every other dictionary, consistent in how words contained in it are universally defined. BTW; using your own reference to persons on the right, why would someone with an average IQ score of 141 defer to others with a collective score ranging between 61 and 100 on the scale?

To further illustrate my point...

Among conservatives, "woke" has been adopted as term of derision for those who hold progressive social justice views. In particular, the word's right-wing connotation implies a "woke" person or entity is being performative or phony.

This is NOT a definition... just a misrepresentation of the word for political gain among those who are too lazy to research it for themselves.

It's a dictionary and like every other dictionary, consistent in how words contained in it are universally defined. BTW; using your own reference to persons on the right, why would someone with an average IQ score of 141 defer to others with a collective score ranging between 61 and 100 on the scale?

To further illustrate my point...

Among conservatives, "woke" has been adopted as term of derision for those who hold progressive social justice views. In particular, the word's right-wing connotation implies a "woke" person or entity is being performative or phony.

This is NOT a definition... just a misrepresentation of the word for political gain among those who are too lazy to research it for themselves.

It's a dictionary and like every other dictionary, consistent in how words contained in it are universally defined. BTW; using your own reference to persons on the right, why would someone with an average IQ score of 141 defer to others with a collective score ranging between 61 and 100 on the scale?

To further illustrate my point...

Among conservatives, "woke" has been adopted as term of derision for those who hold progressive social justice views. In particular, the word's right-wing connotation implies a "woke" person or entity is being performative or phony.

This is NOT a definition... just a misrepresentation of the word for political gain among those who are too lazy to research it for themselves.

It's a dictionary and like every other dictionary, consistent in how words contained in it are universally defined. BTW; using your own reference to persons on the right, why would someone with an average IQ score of 141 defer to others with a collective score ranging between 61 and 100 on the scale?

To further illustrate my point...

Among conservatives, "woke" has been adopted as term of derision for those who hold progressive social justice views. In particular, the word's right-wing connotation implies a "woke" person or entity is being performative or phony.

This is NOT a definition... just a misrepresentation of the word for political gain among those who are too lazy to research it for themselves.

Left wing views that are BS to begin with that aren’t backed up by stats

 

[skinsdad62]

Wokeism is weaponized personal grievances masquerading as a genuine social concern. It’s defined by its fraudulent nature, as being distinct from legitimate social grievances. Wokeism only knows outrage — it knows not empathy for victims.
didn’t take long to find this and it’s far different from the Merrium Webster dictionary

 

[Stymietee]

Left wing views that are BS to begin with that aren’t backed up by stats

Again, it's NOT a "Left-wing" viewpoint, by definition, it is exactly what I originally posted.

Just curious, by ANY definition, what's the opposite of "Woke?" ( Break out your favorite dictionary)

 

[Stymietee]

Wokeism is weaponized personal grievances masquerading as a genuine social concern. It’s defined by its fraudulent nature, as being distinct from legitimate social grievances. Wokeism only knows outrage — it knows not empathy for victims.
didn’t take long to find this and it’s far different from the Merrium Webster dictionary

Give me your source

 

[skinsdad62]

Wokeism has been described by its critics as the omnipresent use of race—and to a lesser extent, gender—to replace meritocracy and thus ensure equality of result. What follows from implementing that ideology are reparatory actions to reward those of the present by atoning for the injustices done to others in the past.

Some see it as an update of 1960s cultural Marxism fads. Others scoff that it is just a return to 1980s-style political correctness.

regardless of sourcing which both sights I used are in fact right wing the meaning of woke/ wokeness have different meanings depending on POV

 

[Stymietee]

Wokeism is weaponized personal grievances masquerading as a genuine social concern. It’s defined by its fraudulent nature, as being distinct from legitimate social grievances. Wokeism only knows outrage — it knows not empathy for victims.
didn’t take long to find this and it’s far different from the Merrium Webster dictionary

BTW; Wokeism isn't definable it represents a wide range of things and/or causes when you add -ism to woke, or any other word.

ism​

noun​

ˈi-zəm
1
: a distinctive doctrine, cause, or theory
2
: an oppressive and especially discriminatory attitude or belief
we all have got to come to grips with our isms—Joycelyn Elders

-ism

noun suffix​

A. act : practice : process
criticism
plagiarism
b. manner of action or behavior characteristic of a (specified) person or thing
animalism
c. prejudice or discrimination on the basis of a (specified) attribute
racism
sexism

: state : condition : property
barbarianism
: abnormal state or condition resulting from excess of a (specified) thing
alcoholism
or marked by resemblance to (such) a person or thing
giantism


: doctrine : theory : religion
Buddhism
: adherence to a system or a class of principles
stoicism
: characteristic or peculiar feature or trait