dtgold88
Well-Known Member
It kind of is that simple. Never mind if we use his OWN numbers his guy is off base. also never mind he moved the goal posts. First he said he was a slightly above avg. QB then he said slightly above avg. franchise QB. But OK..we can go with the latter. HE then said there are 20-25 franchise level QBs, which means 10-12 would be slightly above avg. Then he said Baker could be as high as 8. Then he compared Baker to Eli Manning. Can't imagine many who watch the sport think Eli was not better than "slightly above avg. franchise QB".It's not as simple as that. The level of quarterback play in the NFL goes up and down over the years. Some years there are more qb's playing at a high level than others.
In a season where you have a lot of qb's playing well, a slightly above average qb may fall in the 15-20 range and in years where there are fewer qb's playing at a high level, it may put them closer to 8-10.
No matter what I say....he is shooting down his own theories and his friend did not "nail it". Had he said his friend is close and we'll have to see where Baker ends up"? who would argue with that? But it's not what he said.
Oh, and my favorite is still his guru friend with info he wont share told us he said the following of Baker......"he can succeed if he has a coach who will play to his strengths, but might struggle if he doesn't". How 1 team did not pay him whatever he wanted to make sure that info did not get in the hands of their opponent is hard to believe.