socaljim242
Phantom Marine
Dude's like 90 years old or some shit, he might just want to be done.
It wasn't too long ago I would see him at high school games when recruiting for Hawaii. He's still spry.
Dude's like 90 years old or some shit, he might just want to be done.
chow is 71
Solid wins for sure, but at home and by close margins both. Let's see how that defense does when it comes to Montlake.UW's defense may be "ranked number 1" but we have the only defense in the country that destroyed two Heisman hopefuls chances.
Technically three since Luke Falk faces them in practice and they ruined his confidence.
Solid wins for sure, but at home and by close margins both. Let's see how that defense does when it comes to Montlake.
Browning's play is actually very predictable. If you guys can get pressure on him he'll struggle and look like shit, if you can't, he'll play smart and be accurate. You don't want smart accurate Browning. The run game factors into this equation too, but I wanted to keep it simple.Eh, I don't know. The last few weeks of watching Browning is actually giving me a little bit of optimism..but it also depends on which Falk shows up.
Maybe he will Gary Anderson himselfI knew his buyout was likely more than UCLA would be allowed to pay. But I had no idea it was that outrageous.
He's a vastly different QB at home.Browning's play is actually very predictable. If you guys can get pressure on him he'll struggle and look like shit, if you can't, he'll play smart and be accurate. You don't want smart accurate Browning. The run game factors into this equation too, but I wanted to keep it simple.
That goes with everything else. It's not just he's better at home for home sake. Opposing defenses are typically better at home, so they have a little extra charge to expose our line and get to Browning. USC shut him down in Husky Stadium last year, they were good enough to not need the little extra boost. WSU won't be, is my prediction.He's a vastly different QB at home.
Well if you believe them Browning got his shoulder injury that game and that was really why he had a decline in that game and really through the end of the year. They just didn't talk about it until after the season was over.That goes with everything else. It's not just he's better at home for home sake. Opposing defenses are typically better at home, so they have a little extra charge to expose our line and get to Browning. USC shut him down in Husky Stadium last year, they were good enough to not need the little extra boost. WSU won't be, is my prediction.
I only kind of buy the shoulder thing. He looked great in the Arizona State and WSU games following the injury. It obviously had an effect, but he sucked in that game because he was either on his ass or running backward.Well if you believe them Browning got his shoulder injury that game and that was really why he had a decline in that game and really through the end of the year. They just didn't talk about it until after the season was over.
There's no doubt he's always had issues with pressure. WSU won't be a big worry in that department. Stanford on the road is a different matter.
The bigger problem the rest of the way is they keep losing a different receiver every single week. Can't keep that up and keep the offense running smoothly.
I knew his buyout was likely more than UCLA would be allowed to pay. But I had no idea it was that outrageous.
Browning's play is actually very predictable. If you guys can get pressure on him he'll struggle and look like shit, if you can't, he'll play smart and be accurate. You don't want smart accurate Browning. The run game factors into this equation too, but I wanted to keep it simple.
Ross for sure bailed him out and helped his numbers quite a bit, Browning is still very good though, he'll pick you apart if you can't rattle him. When they commit to the run and get their balanced game going, the UW Offense is still very good. The UW offense seems to get into trouble when you disrupt the game they want to play, I think that's really where Smith earns the critisicm. He can set up a game plan, but if the other team has an answer for it he struggles to adjust.That's why I'm more optimistic this year than last year. I think Ross made him look better than what he has thus far this year. But like i said if shitty Luke Falk shows up it doesn't matter who is at QB we have no shot.
So it might be more of a game than the ass beating it was with Ross.That's why I'm more optimistic this year than last year. I think Ross made him look better than what he has thus far this year. But like i said if shitty Luke Falk shows up it doesn't matter who is at QB we have no shot.
The comments at the bottom of that article are gold.wtf?
Canzano: A Cory Hall-Les Miles combination at Oregon State? Nothing off table, says Hall
i really just want jimmy lake NOW!
View attachment 169128