- Thread starter
- #1
Sharkinva
Well-Known Member
So we apparently still ave some fans who think we shouldnt resign Cousins. This is not a question, its a statement of fact.
So lets say for a moment, we tank the rest of the season, finish 3-13. Now lets also say the Niners have managed to actually WIN 3 games, so same record. BUt due to the tie breaker, and as we have the head to head, we actually pick behind them.
The stars have aligned (for some folks around here), we sucked and have the perfect reason to ditch Kirk no matter what his over all performance was. Because at the end of the day, he couldnt carry the team or he sucked or what ever.
Now suppose Kyle in his infinite Wisdom signs Kirk, but still has the #1 pick. Do we in fact trade up to take Darnold (Or who ever the current cant miss QB is come draft time) Knowing that it could still cost us in effect what we gave up in our last trade.
Or do we settle for the #2 guy again??
Mind you i have conceded that we would not resign Kirk in this instance for any reason at any price.
OK... GO
So lets say for a moment, we tank the rest of the season, finish 3-13. Now lets also say the Niners have managed to actually WIN 3 games, so same record. BUt due to the tie breaker, and as we have the head to head, we actually pick behind them.
The stars have aligned (for some folks around here), we sucked and have the perfect reason to ditch Kirk no matter what his over all performance was. Because at the end of the day, he couldnt carry the team or he sucked or what ever.
Now suppose Kyle in his infinite Wisdom signs Kirk, but still has the #1 pick. Do we in fact trade up to take Darnold (Or who ever the current cant miss QB is come draft time) Knowing that it could still cost us in effect what we gave up in our last trade.
Or do we settle for the #2 guy again??
Mind you i have conceded that we would not resign Kirk in this instance for any reason at any price.
OK... GO