BamaFanAlways
Active Member
Why? It would be even clearer on who the top 4 teams are. UCF isn't one of them
I accidentally left OU out of the first post.... i was trying to say 6 undefeated teams....
Why? It would be even clearer on who the top 4 teams are. UCF isn't one of them
I accidentally left OU out of the first post.... i was trying to say 6 undefeated teams....
Both of them have their shortcomings, no question, but who doesn't this year outside of Bama?That's fair but also not what people are saying . Neither team ( OU or OSU ) has looked like a playoff team much of the year
Losing to a G5 team...or Iowa.As it pertains to the playoff .
I've seen a lot of people state " you can't lose by 29 to 6-6 Purdue and make the playoff"
Conversely I don't remember anyone stating that Clemson should not have gotten in last year despite losing by 3 to a 4-8 team .
So I'm assuming the answer lies in between but I'm curious .
What do you personally see as a disqualifying loss?
Is losing by 2 to a 2-10 team ok? 21 to a 8-4 team? 31 to a 10-2 team? 17 to a 5-7 team?
Let's hear what you think and why
Funny how losing to bad teams didn’t keep non-Blue Bloods of Washington, Oregon, and Michigan State from making the playoffs. Why is that?A loss at HOME to Iowa State or a loss to Syracuse......nevermind, all that matters is the color of your blood.
Lol, Iowa would destroy you fucking Okies.Losing to a G5 team...or Iowa.
You shut your bitch mouth and get back in the kitchen whore.Lol, Iowa would destroy you fucking Okies.
explain thisFunny how losing to bad teams didn’t keep non-Blue Bloods of Washington, Oregon, and Michigan State from making the playoffs. Why is that?
That non Blue Bloods have made the playoffs and didn’t need to be undefeated to do it.explain this
That wasn't the question, but to address your point:That non Blue Bloods have made the playoffs and didn’t need to be undefeated to do it.
You can survive that when they are close losses and you are comparing it to teams that have more losses and losses by over 30 points.That wasn't the question, but to address your point:
-Oregon lost early in the season to an eventual 10-3 Arizona
-MSU lost a fluke to Nebraska, but ran the gamut against #12 Mich, #2 OSU and #6 PSU, #5 Iowa
-Washington lost to 10-3 USC
My point was you should lose at home to a shit Iowa St team or a shit syracuse team and be in the CFP.
Funny how losing to bad teams didn’t keep non-Blue Bloods of Washington, Oregon, and Michigan State from making the playoffs. Why is that?
As it pertains to the playoff .
I've seen a lot of people state " you can't lose by 29 to 6-6 Purdue and make the playoff"
Conversely I don't remember anyone stating that Clemson should not have gotten in last year despite losing by 3 to a 4-8 team .
So I'm assuming the answer lies in between but I'm curious .
What do you personally see as a disqualifying loss?
Is losing by 2 to a 2-10 team ok? 21 to a 8-4 team? 31 to a 10-2 team? 17 to a 5-7 team?
Let's hear what you think and why
You can survive that when they are close losses and you are comparing it to teams that have more losses and losses by over 30 points.
So who should have gone that year? Ohio State that took a 30 point loss to Iowa AND lost to Oklahoma by two touchdowns or USC who lost by 5 touchdowns to Notre Dame AND lost to Washington fucking State?Lol, I'm not comparing anything. My post was a response to a question. I said if you lose at home to Iowa fucking State, you have no business being in the CFP.
You're the one arguing and comparing.
So who should have gone that year? Ohio State that took a 30 point loss to Iowa AND lost to Oklahoma by two touchdowns or USC who lost by 5 touchdowns to Notre Dame AND lost to Washington fucking State?
Seasons do not exist in a vacuum.