lmao, so you bull shit it? It wasn't a great game, but it was a pretty wild finish. Also, it's rated in the 40's for a reason.
Across The Field takes this shit very seriously.
lmao, so you bull shit it? It wasn't a great game, but it was a pretty wild finish. Also, it's rated in the 40's for a reason.
That must mean there were only 42 other football games played last year then, because that was absolutely horrible, unenjoyable football with no redeeming value.
Across The Field takes this shit very seriously.
That fact that you believe that is what good football looks like makes me significantly more confident in my comments about Clarett, given your uproarious disagreements.It was a crappy game, with a pretty remarkable ending. And the outcome had significant meaning.
I casually strolled in and placed it, I wasn't in a hurry.Agreed, this was a thread for fun, to relive the best games of last year, and to get us to this season, and he comes flying in with a b.s. rating. lol.
That fact that you believe that is what good football looks like makes me significantly more confident in my comments about Clarett, given your uproarious disagreements.
This makes no senseYou either can't read or comprehend, which is it? lol.
I casually strolled in and placed it, I wasn't in a hurry.
It was mostly because of your blatant homerism towards a mediocre Stanford team/coach.
Also, this is just flat out false.It was a crappy game, with a pretty remarkable ending. And the outcome had significant meaning.
I don't understand it eitherYep, such a big homer for my teams rival.
This makes no sense
You said it was a crappy game.I said, "it was a crappy game".
You said, "That fact that you believe that is what good football looks like"
So which is it?
Also, this is just flat out false.
Who cares? So it means a mediocre team from a horrible division doesn't get to go lose in the CCG. Big deal.Without winning Stanford doesn't play in the Pac 12 CG. Probably finishes the season unranked. It had more meaning, in that regard, than the other games surrounding them, which was part of my reasoning.
You said it was a crappy game.
The title of your thread suggests "the top games".
Which is it?
No bullshit at all, pick damn near any 50 games you want. Stanford-Oregon State was absolute horseshit football. It was Thursday night football, so I watched it because nothing else was on, and it was dreadful.So @Across The Field name 50 better games last season.
How do you comprehend the phrase "top games"? In the normal world, it implies enjoyable games where good football was played. This game was the polar opposite of that.The top FIFTY games. It's #43. Did you miss the 50 part because you can't read or comprehend?
So it should be easy. Name 50 better games since you want to talk so much shit.No bullshit at all, pick damn near any 50 games you want. Stanford-Oregon State was absolute horseshit football. It was Thursday night football, so I watched it because nothing else was on, and it was dreadful.