The Bree ze league

[Brees#1]

Well if my starters stay healthy you have no chance. My starters going down is the only way I lose.

 

[Sam Sportboy]

Charlie who? I got offers for him before. Oh this is because of Boldin going I see.

 

[Brees#1]

Seriously, why was I offered Dalton before then? Is anyone still interested in Rodgers? Do I need to deal Forte?

 

[Brees#1]

Taylor plays the jets week 1, a team who let Revis go. Also, bills coming off getting swept by them, so for week 1 Taylor will be fine for me. Looks like I'm gonna have to stream QBs.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Seriously, why was I offered Dalton before then? Is anyone still interested in Rodgers? Do I need to deal Forte?

Because said owner was looking for some RB depth, said owner ended up addressing that problem in a different manner.

 

[Robotech]

Why should we do that? He'll be on the WW soon enough...if someone was in a real jam for a QB.

Also, his WR's are unproven.

 

[Barilko]

 

[Brees#1]

Also, his WR's are unproven.

I know how to play the matchups.

 

[Sam Sportboy]

I know how to play the matchups.

ASYS

 

[TREFF]

Well if my starters stay healthy you have no chance. My starters going down is the only way I lose.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Also, his WR's are unproven.

I don't hate his WRs, but he's light on them for sure. His starters are high risk/ high reward types, I actually like that stradegy, but you got get some candidates on your roster to back them up. He went overboard on RB depth with 7 RBs and his starters are solid so that was not smart. What he should of done is get some depth at RB, but load up on WRs that got upside. He's going end up dropping some of those RBs, because they got little trade value and not useful for his roster, by that I mean they will not ever be in his line up and he's going to be in a bind at WR at some point, with byes and injuries. Wasted picks.

 

[Robotech]

I don't hate his WRs, but he's light on them for sure. His starters are high risk/ high reward types, I actually like that stradegy, but you got get some candidates on your roster to back them up. He went overboard on RB depth with 7 RBs and his starters are solid so that was not smart. What he should of done is get some depth at RB, but load up on WRs that got upside. He's going end up dropping some of those RBs, because they got little trade value and not useful for his roster, by that I mean they will not ever be in his line up and he's going to be in a bind at WR at some point, with byes and injuries. Wasted picks.

Sorry I wasn't clear. I was talking about Tyrod Taylor's receiving targets. You had made a comment questioning why anyone in our league would trade for Tyrod Taylor when he could wind up on the waiver wire anyway.

 

[Sam Sportboy]

I don't hate his WRs, but he's light on them for sure. His starters are high risk/ high reward types, I actually like that stradegy, but you got get some candidates on your roster to back them up. He went overboard on RB depth with 7 RBs and his starters are solid so that was not smart. What he should of done is get some depth at RB, but load up on WRs that got upside. He's going end up dropping some of those RBs, because they got little trade value and not useful for his roster, by that I mean they will not ever be in his line up and he's going to be in a bind at WR at some point, with byes and injuries. Wasted picks.

I can see that with part of my team too...............with this many on the bench.......shit, I already dropped one of my originals

 

[Robotech]

I don't hate his WRs, but he's light on them for sure. His starters are high risk/ high reward types, I actually like that stradegy, but you got get some candidates on your roster to back them up. He went overboard on RB depth with 7 RBs and his starters are solid so that was not smart. What he should of done is get some depth at RB, but load up on WRs that got upside. He's going end up dropping some of those RBs, because they got little trade value and not useful for his roster, by that I mean they will not ever be in his line up and he's going to be in a bind at WR at some point, with byes and injuries. Wasted picks.

I may need to pick up the RB's he drops. I think I'm lacking in RB depth.

 

[TREFF]

Sorry I wasn't clear. I was talking about Tyrod Taylor's receiving targets. You had made a comment questioning why anyone in our league would trade for Tyrod Taylor when he could wind up on the waiver wire anyway.

Ha, that's how i was reading that exchange as well

 

[Brees#1]

I had the last pick in the draft. I didn't see anybody there that I liked to go with Pryor. I could have taken Crabtree, but he's just a possession and redzone. I certainly was not gonna take overrated Davontae Adams or Alshon Jeffery. I would take Jeffery now but this draft was the first week of August when there was no plan in sight to trade Matthews. That's why drafts should not be that early. Ty Hill? As I said he won't repeat. It's the way the NFL is today. There were slim options there at 36. Also, at that time I had not decided on Allen. My recent draft showed I took that chance.

I do have seven RBs and people will be hungry for one of them once the season starts.

 

[HaroldSeattle]

Sorry I wasn't clear. I was talking about Tyrod Taylor's receiving targets. You had made a comment questioning why anyone in our league would trade for Tyrod Taylor when he could wind up on the waiver wire anyway.

Yeah I misunderstood. Definitely looks like Bills are competing with the Jets for top draft choice.

 

[Robotech]

I had the last pick in the draft. I didn't see anybody there that I liked to go with Pryor. I could have taken Crabtree, but he's just a possession and redzone. I certainly was not gonna take overrated Davontae Adams or Alshon Jeffery. I would take Jeffery now but this draft was the first week of August when there was no plan in sight to trade Matthews. That's why drafts should not be that early. Ty Hill? As I said he won't repeat. It's the way the NFL is today. There were slim options there at 36. Also, at that time I had not decided on Allen. My recent draft showed I took that chance.

I do have seven RBs and people will be hungry for one of them once the season starts.

Also, it would be ideal to get preseason injuries out of the way before we draft, but I'm not complaining even though I lost Spencer Ware. I know it's hard to figure out a day where we can all come together for the draft.

 

[TREFF]

I do have seven RBs and people will be hungry for one of them once the season starts.

I'm trying to be nice. . but man it burns. . burns me to my core

 

[Brees#1]

The only RBs I drop is who ends up not retaining their jobs. I'll know by week 4 who is gonna get enough carries to be fantasy relevant. If Martin outruns Rodgers week 4(which is a tall order against the giants), then Rodgers has no value then. If Powell has cut that much into Forte's value(unless Forte gets traded), then Forte will be useless. Williams is clearly a handcuff to Gordon because Oliver sucks.

As for my receivers, go look at Bryant's game logs from 2014-2015. Also Ginn JR is going to be most effective in games Brees airs it out. That's going to be week 2 vs NE, week 4 vs Miami, week 6 vs Det, week 8 vs Chicago, week 9 vs Washington(Norman will be on Thomas often), week 13 vs Carolina. He's actually got the second best value at WR on the saints. Willie Snead is not a deep threat nor a top redzone option. How do I know? Because Cooks was not a redzone target as much as people think last year. He was used as a big play threat.

The giants didn't sign Marshall for nothing. Otherwise they would have kept Cruz. And then there's Pryor, but let's base everything off of vanilla schemes in preseason.