- Thread starter
- #1
Seriously.. it shows that SEC teams were granted easy passes to the NCG and mostly played patsies... ChokeHio State twice, Chokelahoma twice, Notre Lame that in no way deserved to be there... an intra-SEC final... and Texas with Gilbert Grape who still had the ball with three minutes down by only three.
The Auburn-Oregon win was legit, though.
My bad... hard to argue "didn't deserve to be there"... but they were CLEARLY a patsy.
lmao at you tying to nitpick the slightest mis-wording when you know the message is clearly true.
The 4-team playoff certainly gets rid of some (a lot?) of the randomness of the BCS system. I still don't think it's close to being perfect but I'm also thinking there may not be a single best way to determine a national champion.
They should certainly stay with this system for awhile. It might grow on me some more.
BCS: automatically put, at least, one SEC team in the NCG and see what happens [usually against patsies].
Kinda hard NOT to dominate. Congrats cuz they still won those games, but seriously... some of us have been calling BS on it for a decade.
Four teams is perfect. No one is truly left out unless there are five or more undefeated teams, yet there is just enough uncertainty (TCU) to make for some great discussion which is good for SportsHoopla. Hope they don't switch to eight teams any time soon.
We don't want to crown an "end of season tourney champ."
We want to crown a "season champ."
4 is best.
After the latest happenings how can you say that?
All you have is the tourney card left to play. Come on, the great game of football deserves to be played out. 4 teams has shown the potential (it's one season) of the old system. Why do you fear 6 or 8? They prob could win it!