- Thread starter
- #581
I think its a better idea if the votes are given to two people on the outside chance I win again I dont want anyone thinking its fishy...
Congrats to the wieners!
1. Gold
2. WLK
3. 500
Nice job fellas. Is it me or does it seem like 500 and WLK are always in the top 3?
Decided yet?
Oh and Mauer sucks, maybe the worst contract in MLB history...
If the playoffs started today the Twins would lose to the Yankees (Again) in the WC game. Ooops I mean play... Okay I mean lose...
IMO, the changing votes on rebuttal is a massive mistakeHere is a possible New way to vote that may work...
owners are not allowed to vote in games where they are playing...
When you Vote, you must write at least one sentence saying why team A should win, and another sentence saying why team A should lose.
the teams owner in question is ONLY allowed to rebut the points the voter makes(they can not sell their team).
After rebuttal, the voter is allowed to change his vote...
IMO, the changing votes on rebuttal is a massive mistake
I actually think this is the most important part... doesn't it bother you when someone votes and gives you a reason you think is BS... And you want to show them why they are wrong... by allowing a revote, you are advocating for that voter to actually READ your rebuttal...
I'm just giving you trial and error opinion from someone who's seen us try that. Then it becomes a raging argument, and people pissed because they feel like someone talked someone out of a vote. Just make your vote, list your reasons, and stick to it IMOI actually think this is the most important part... doesn't it bother you when someone votes and gives you a reason you think is BS... And you want to show them why they are wrong... by allowing a revote, you are advocating for that voter to actually READ your rebuttal...