- Thread starter
- #1
SI actually got something right
well yeah that one was a given
what do you mean by "mocked"?
like we mocked it when it first came out?
what do you mean by "mocked"?
like we mocked it when it first came out?
2014 Sports Illustrated cover predicted the 2017 World Serieswhat do you mean by "mocked"?
like we mocked it when it first came out?
asshole goes out on a limb and picks the yankees for 2020.......
not with the way they tried to hand that national semifinal to duke with made up calls on Okafor.
Didn't work though But yes after years later I can admit they did try
If it did work I'd be talking about it the way I talk about the laughably rigged Game 7 of the 2010 NBA Finals.
I will never watch an NBA game again after that traveshamockery.
All that narrative that went on and on about draft picks and they still needed Verlander to finish it off, and Gattis, and McCann.
I honestly never completely bought into that 'ranking' of farm systems. You need one Altuve every two years, not 13 of them. The principle of winning is finding a mix of players, modifying, taking a chance on the draft, and on trading draft picks ...every team needs a supporting cast.
But they added the core of the team via internal pieces (Keuchel, Correa, Altuve, Bregman, Springer).
No team is 100% homegrown.
In fact, what makes them so impressive is how they used basically every avenue available.
Draft (Correa, Keuchel, Springer, Bregman, McCullers)
INTNL FA: (Altuve)
Rule 5 Draft: (Marwin)
Trades: (McCann, Devensky, Verlander, Peacock, Giles and Gattis)
Waiver Claims: (McHugh and Will Harris)
Regular FA: (Reddick)
I honestly never completely bought into that 'ranking' of farm systems. You need one Altuve every two years, not 13 of them. The principle of winning is finding a mix of players, modifying, taking a chance on the draft, and on trading draft picks ...
But yeah, in order to complete the puzzle, a team needs to make smart decisions on which pieces they are, and which ones they can afford to give up to get them.