- Thread starter
- #1
Fountain City Blues
Love Everybody
Discuss.
What's their record with Bill Cowher on the sidelines. Equally useful questions.What's the Chiefs record without Hunt?
actually @broncosmitty has a point, one they were winning with, the other is complete non senseWhat's their record with Bill Cowher on the sidelines. Equally useful questions.
Is it?What's their record with Bill Cowher on the sidelines. Equally useful questions.
If the point has zero explanatory power, it's nonsense.actually @broncosmitty has a point, one they were winning with, the other is complete non sense
how is losing an all pro player, who was producing greatly on ur team, and now ur team has some losses, not valid at all,If the point has zero explanatory power, it's nonsense.
Because runningbacks don’t matter; or matter for like .25 wins over 16 games, if we assume the RB replacement is meh.how is losing an all pro player, who was producing greatly on ur team, and now ur team has some losses, not valid at all,
now im on board to an extent, to an extent.......but the stars add up here....Because runningbacks don’t matter; or matter for like .25 wins over 16 games, if we assume the RB replacement is meh.
Because runningbacks don’t matter; or matter for like .25 wins over 16 games, if we assume the RB replacement is meh.
A is not literal; the .25 number is paraphrasing Eric Eager on the topic.Isn’t that circular?
A: Running backs don’t matter.
B: But the Chiefs were 9-2 with a star RB and are only 2-2 without him.
A: Your counterpoint is invalid.
B: Why?
A: Running backs don’t matter.