- Thread starter
- #1
It's been obvious for years that Duke and UK are paying players
And Zona. They snatched a recruit from OSU without him ever even visiting
No typically there are hookers involved as well.Just pay them. If somebody can get 6 figures for playing college ball for someone then why stop them? Some people make this shit sound like the person accused was selling kilos of cocaine.
I'd be worried if I was an NC State fan.
No typically there are hookers involved as well.
Jerry Tarkanian, is that you? "“The NCAA was so mad at Kentucky they gave Cleveland State two more years of probation.”NCAA should just give Arizona the death penalty as a warning shot to UK and Duke. Outside of that, UK and Duke should receive no other penalties
From my experience, that is exactly the playbook lawyers follow. The thing is, the good lawyers like to have a chance of something sticking. Otherwise they are just chasing rabbits....Seems like an objection as to relevance would be the appropriate response to RTAs. Can anyone explain how the alleged receipt of impermissible ncaa benefits has any bearing on the breach of contract dispute?
It just looks as if they are bitching about not keeping Zion signed and throwing anything and everything at the bullseye/dart board- hoping something sticks
From my experience, that is exactly the playbook lawyers follow. The thing is, the good lawyers like to have a chance of something sticking. Otherwise they are just chasing rabbits....
It's pretty obvious.They are asking for admittance of guilt from Zion. It is a public shaming campaign to gain a monetary settlement.