- Thread starter
- #1
OregonDucks
Oregon Is Faster
and attempt to do his job, otherwise he'll be out of Ann Arbor.
One thing I will never understand is how some of these schools (usually blue bloods) go with that whole
"Well he is a Michigan man" or "We need a Michigan man" ----------> total garbage imo.
What the hell does that have to do with anything if you are serious about winning your conference and even more?
* Not trying to pick on you UM fans. Just used as an example and it was appropriate to OPs thread.
You are right one thing the "black shirt" tradition did not do was pigeon hole the team into who they hire. Michigan went with this "Michigan Man" and they may have screwed themselves. They hired a "Michigan Man" who has had a team sanctioned by the NCAA, is an average coach and has show a lack of punishment for his players. That is not a good combination but they got a "Michigan Man".No offense Mamba, but Oregon is not steeped in tradition. Without Knight's money they would likely still be a PAC bottom dweller, I can see how you don't understand.
I will give you an example as I know it.
Nebraska's defense is known as the Blackshirts. The 'tradition' stems from the early 60's when the equipment manager was sent to a local sporting goods store to buy jerseys for just the starting players. The coaching staff just wanted the starters to wear a different color in practice to monitor them easier. The only color the store had enough of at the time were black. If you weren't a clear starter you didn't wear one so there were only 11 or 12 at the most. Wearing a black shirt in practice became a source of pride and a motivational factor. Nobody's black practice jersey was safe from being taken by a back-up. The black shirts were placed in lockers daily just prior to practice. A player who went to his locker to get suited up and found a black shirt was elated and worked hard to keep it. Back-ups worked harder to try and take it. If there was a position without a clear starter, there was no black shirt for that position in practice, so sometimes there may have only been 9 players wearing black shirts during practice. They were not intended to become a motivational tool, but they became one.
In the Callahan/Cosgrove era, (not Nebraska men) Cosgrove passed them out in practice like candy. Just about anyone on the two/three deep got one (You're on defense, here's your Blackshirt). It got diluted to the point where they were meaningless and no longer a motivational tool. Nebraska's defense was horrid.
Enter Bo Pelino (also not a Nebraska man). Bo looks at the defense as "a unit". Either every starter gets a black shirt or not a single one does. Suh, David, Amukamara etc..did not get their black shirts until over halfway into the season because the defense (as a whole) was not playing up to Pelino's standards. His handling/methodology of the Blackshirts has been a source of contention with the media and fans for years now. Nebraska's defense has been horrid.
Neither of these guys are "Nebraska men" and they don't understand the traditions associated with the program.
All blue-bloods have their own little nuances that the next coach in line needs to embrace.
Rich Rod >
How was he worse than Hoke?no. RR had two losing seasons and was an embarrassing representative of our University.
no. RR had two losing seasons and was an embarrassing representative of our University.