- Thread starter
- #1
hi frank.
I think that can be said about a lot of players. A super star QB with all the talent in the world will die on a team with a dud coach and a poor draft ethic. I think Tom described most NFL players perfectly."I'm really a product of what I've been around, who I was coached by, what I played against, in the era I played in. I really believe if a lot of people were in my shoes they could accomplish the same kinds of things. So I've been very fortunate."
Humility pie or the truth?
A lot of people have said about him exactly what he said about himself. Personally, I think the player, the coach and the team were a perfect match. The result of that perfect match is two decades of Superbowl contention and a handful of rings. I'm unconvinced Tom could've replicated that success on another team.
and could peyton have in cleveland?"I'm really a product of what I've been around, who I was coached by, what I played against, in the era I played in. I really believe if a lot of people were in my shoes they could accomplish the same kinds of things. So I've been very fortunate."
Humility pie or the truth?
A lot of people have said about him exactly what he said about himself. Personally, I think the player, the coach and the team were a perfect match. The result of that perfect match is two decades of Superbowl contention and a handful of rings. I'm unconvinced Tom could've replicated that success on another team.
ryan mallet, mike oconnell...mike bishop, etc etcYeah look at Matt Cassel...
Hall of Famer for sure.
and could peyton have in cleveland?
or marino in AZ?
or montana in say, chicago?
we can debate all day...
yeah but he had harrison and wayne. thats my point.Honestly, I think Peyton could have had similar success in Cleveland. As it was, he carried a garbage Colts team to contention every year.
I think Montana could have easily won in Chicago because they had Sweetness a wicked defense in the '80s. Put him on the '80s Bucs and he never comes close to the legendary status he has now.
yeah but he had harrison and wayne. thats my point.
both were high first rounders.It's really difficult to determine cause/effect with that comparison. Did Harrison and Wayne make Manning larger than real life or did Manning's greatness make his receivers larger than real life. There's probably a little bit of both in there, but my perception is that Manning had a greater impact on his receivers' productivity than his receivers did on his productivity.
The Marino-Clayton-Duper trio were a similar lot. And similar to Manning's Colts, Marino's Dolphins never really had the complete team necessary to win a Superbowl, but Marino was good enough to drive an overall average team into the playoffs every year.
And he's right, BB is that good of a coach and that is the house that built Tom Brady....
both were high first rounders.
im not going down this road, but how many first round picks (team drafted) did brady ever have at WR? shit, gimme a second rounder...
and kudos on the marino/duper/clayton deal.
duper was a 2nd rounder, clayton an eight.
Let me just square this for all concerned.
Brady is 5th all time in attempts. And yet he is 2nd all time in TD/Int ratio with 456 TD's to 152 Ints
Rodgers is first but he has just over half the attempts.
That is not just Belichick
Be careful. That is dangerously close to "Brady is a system QB"
And from there, your credibility sinks to a place from which it never returns.
![]()
.
Read the article, he said so himself...