ehb5
HTTR
Interesting. Daniel Jeremiah has Baker going #1.
That seems like the way things are learning right now. Darnold 2 and Rosen 3 then maybe?
Interesting. Daniel Jeremiah has Baker going #1.
Given McCloughan helping with the Browns draft, Mayfield honestly wouldn’t surprise me.That seems like the way things are learning right now. Darnold 2 and Rosen 3 then maybe?
Given McCloughan helping with the Browns draft, Mayfield honestly wouldn’t surprise me.
No way do they go anything but QB at 1 imo. New GM is tying himself to the QB, so why wouldn’t you choose the guy your sold on - whoever that might be.Still thinking the Browns should take Barkley at #1, and then still have their choice of QBs at #4 minus who ever the Jets take. Because I think NY will take Barkley or Chubb. And if BArkley aint there, they still aint going to take a QB at #2.
Here's the thing, if the Browns pass on Barkley at #1 and the Giants select a QB or Chubb, Barkley will become a Brown at #4. Team's moving up into the top 5 are doing so in order to take a QB. This makes the Giants pick the key to what I'm sure they (the Browns) are counting on in order to get Quarterback then running back. The consolation prize for them is Chubb at #4. It's a win...win...win proposition for them no matter how it plays out.
Gotta agree with GK. I love Martavis but a 3rd is too much
Anybody think the Browns taking 2 QBs is a good idea? I know it seems crazy and youd have to do some research but going Baker then Rosen could pay off.
Anybody think the Browns taking 2 QBs is a good idea? I know it seems crazy and youd have to do some research but going Baker then Rosen could pay off.
Non sense at all. Trading a pick could make sense.
I do think trading 4 makes a ton of sense for them. Trade or Chubb IMO. And itll never happen but...2 shots at a franchise QB...you could do much dumber things.