- Thread starter
- #1
justforkicks
New Member
I know this subject has been argued to death on most of these forums, but I heard earlier on the Gary Radnich show, a wrinkle that I never heard before. It might have come from Larry Krueger or another one of Gary's guest, but they stated that the niners liked Rodgers more than Smith. They were going to take Rodgers, who they thought would be a better pro, but they had an agreement with Tampa Bay to trade the #1 pick(Smith) for the #5 and some other parts. Then the Bucs reneged on the deal after news had come out that the niners intended to draft Smith. So the niners ended up taking Smith anyways.
If this is true I don't know who to dislike more, the Bucs or the Nolan regime. I mean I still despise the Nolan regime, but the Bucs need to get some of the blame right?
I've always believed that Rodgers wouldn't be the same player if he were drafted by the Nolan regime, so I guess the point is moot as usual.
If this is true I don't know who to dislike more, the Bucs or the Nolan regime. I mean I still despise the Nolan regime, but the Bucs need to get some of the blame right?
I've always believed that Rodgers wouldn't be the same player if he were drafted by the Nolan regime, so I guess the point is moot as usual.