- Thread starter
- #1
deep9er
Well-Known Member
49ers Give Raheem Mostert a Raise
I think Mostert is a very good runner in this offense, so glad to retain him WITHOUT furtherissue. However, don't like that it sets a precedence going forward. ie IF Lynch had decided to stand pat, i would've been ok with that too. Would've hurt not having Mostert but you have to think of the TEAM.
Anyway, incentives is the only "compromise" they could've taken. Giving Mostert an outright raise definitely sets a bad precedence.
The problem is actually Tevin Coleman getting too much money, he might be steady at best but not worth his contract. To me, they should've traded Coleman and kept Breida, or just traded both. With Coleman gone, Mostert wouldn't have as strong a case.
Oh well....................
I think Mostert is a very good runner in this offense, so glad to retain him WITHOUT furtherissue. However, don't like that it sets a precedence going forward. ie IF Lynch had decided to stand pat, i would've been ok with that too. Would've hurt not having Mostert but you have to think of the TEAM.
Anyway, incentives is the only "compromise" they could've taken. Giving Mostert an outright raise definitely sets a bad precedence.
The problem is actually Tevin Coleman getting too much money, he might be steady at best but not worth his contract. To me, they should've traded Coleman and kept Breida, or just traded both. With Coleman gone, Mostert wouldn't have as strong a case.
Oh well....................