NWPATSFAN
Well-Known Member
You wildly biased against the Seahawks. There are some Seahawks homers who are saying that this was a home run trade for the Seahawks. You are the opposite arguing that it was a terrible trade and intentionally frame it as negatively as possible.
Rational people who at least try to be objective will admit that it is too early to tell whether this is a great or terrible trade for either side.
If Jamal Adams is a perennial All-Pro over the next 5-6 years with the Seahawks then this is a hands down for the Seahawks. If he leaves after this contract or regresses as a player then it is a bad trade for the Seahawks. It's that simple. That you can't even accept the possibility that this trade might work for the Seahawks gives the game away about your motives.
Take off the homer glasses. I've said multiple times how much of an upgrade Adams is.
But unlike you and others I'm not going to sugarcoat it.
I see how you and others are changing the criteria on how they'll rate if this was a good trade or not?
With that much draft and monetary capital invested. Fans should call for JS and PC heads if it doesn't result in a SB. They went all in, not to see Adams make PBs.