- Thread starter
- #1
thisI have a friend who used to work at baseball info solutions.
He said that the success against the shift via bunt is like 2/3.
So basically you have an ops over 1.200 by bunting
bunt
No one should take advice on hitting from Kyle Seager.Exactly and they all use the stupid excuse of “you need 2 more singles to score” and bs like that.
As if getting 1 guy on doesn’t start rallies forcing pitchers to go to the stretch, defenses to play more straight up, hits and runs etc..
I guess that’s why Seager has a .290 OBP
Even Ted Williams did this in the '46 World Series.I have a friend who used to work at baseball info solutions.
He said that the success against the shift via bunt is like 2/3.
So basically you have an ops over 1.200 by bunting
Exactly and they all use the stupid excuse of “you need 2 more singles to score” and bs like that.
As if getting 1 guy on doesn’t start rallies forcing pitchers to go to the stretch, defenses to play more straight up, hits and runs etc..
I guess that’s why Seager has a .290 OBP
He’s a head case. Too inconsistent even though his numbers usually end up average. He is a slightly below average 3rd baseman at the plate and slightly above average in the field. Even in the field he will make some serious boneheaded plays.He was a good hitter until the last 1.5 seasons.
I couldn't believe that when I saw it. I guess walks are bad too then?
Seems a pretty decent strategy.
He’s a head case. Too inconsistent even though his numbers usually end up average. He is a slightly below average 3rd baseman at the plate and slightly above average in the field. Even in the field he will make some serious boneheaded plays.