No love lost for LSU this year, but last year was not a good team. 4 losses, including a Notre Dame team that was murdered by Miami. Wisconsin beats that team by 17+. Danny Etling wasn't moving the ball on that defense, so they're stacking the box.
If it don't matter, A&M would have never moved up
So after 3 games, you can tell me Wisconsin is gonna have one of their worst defenses in a decade and Stanford is gonna have one of their best. I think it was around this time last year you were telling me Stanford is elite, so I'll keep that in mind.
BYU, New Mexico and WKU all SUCK on offense this season. Look it up. The fact that BYU scored on half the possessions when they were trying to, should be telling. Also, it's a fact this is Wisconsin's worst defense since 2010. Some of that is because they aren't as good, but mostly because they've had elite/great/very good defenses over that time frame. Couple that with the personnel losses/injuries, I don't know how saying this, could possibly come as being biased. Holy shit.
Stanford has played well defensively in all 3 games thus far. Also UC-Davis literally scored on the last play of the game. This has probably been one of Stanford's best defenses in the same time frame. Outside of one drive against San Diego State, they've looked good.
Nice backpedal
Yeah that's just flat out wrong. VT was more consistent and had a better W/L in that timeframe.
VT finished lower than they started in half the time. They ended up higher than they started only once.
Because we all know the ACC Coastal has been booming with powerhouses over the last decade.
I have been since they hired Haden Fry. Fry's a West Texas guy. Born in Eastland and rasied in Odessa.
Because we all know the ACC Coastal has been booming with powerhouses over the last decade.
Cal is 3-0 with a direct win over BYU who's 25 in the AP Poll.....That's all you can come up with
So who should get in over A&M?
I think "the eye test" and polling systems may be the worst gauges in sports.Which you can see quite clearly here. I'm not fond of rankings based on opinion rather than actual results. I cant buy Tamu being ranked based on the concept of a "quality loss". The play off committee rankings are just as bad. But I prefer consistency and a concrete gauge. Tbh I think college football is long overdue for a more substantial system. Too much decided by opinion and bias etc. Not enough measured on the actual field.
