- Thread starter
- #461
bksballer89
Most Popular Member
Blown call. Sherman held Jones arm. Clear pass interference
looked like good coverage on Julio to me
Watch it again and watch Julio's right arm. Sherm never lets go of itlooked like good coverage on Julio to me
Wow no DPI on that? Seattle squeaks out another controversially win.
Sorry I meant another DAK fumble. He kept us alive but Rodgers gave it right back.Wake up. You dozed off.
No problem we're used to Seattle getting the controversial calls. Most teams game plan for it now.It may have been DPI. But was it called? Nope! So tough shit, not Seattle's problem.
No problem we're used to Seattle getting the controversial calls. Most teams game plan for it now.
Stop it. No one gets more controversial calls then Seattle. Look at everyone here (no Hawk fans). But keep denying. Just like you saying it "may" have been DPISays the Patriots fan... This is the epitome of the pot calling the kettle black.
So sherman was no right to the ball????
LOL, deflect much? that was clearly PI.Says the Patriots fan... This is the epitome of the pot calling the kettle black.
If anything I think it was a make up call for the non DPI call a few minutes earlier
Sherm most certainly does have a right to the ball. However, he doesn't have a right to Jones' armSo sherman was no right to the ball????
LOL, deflect much? that was clearly PI.
He held his arm. No need to be a homer. It was a missed call. It happens
Sherm most certainly does have a right to the ball. However, he doesn't have a right to Jones' arm
It's cool dude, relax, your team won. Just my opinion on the call.If you said what I said prior. I clearly said it may have been DPI, but it wasn't called. This is the NFL it happens, especially when the human element is involved. But if you want to pick and choose what was said. So be it, but before you say something actually read prior posts.