- Thread starter
- #1
ROMOTOOWENS
Well-Known Member
Is something in the contracts different now. CBS is usually AFC and Fox NFC. Last week Panthers/ Vikings was on CBS. This week Jags/Texans are on Fox.
It was due to the flex schedule.Is something in the contracts different now. CBS is usually AFC and Fox NFC. Last week Panthers/ Vikings was on CBS. This week Jags/Texans are on Fox.
It's pretty simple now. We need to Falcons to lose two out of three. They have T.B., N.O. and Carolina. We need Detroit to lose 1 of 2. And we need to win outWho should we be pulling for Panthers or GB
Is it that simple now? No matter who wins in GB/Car? Atl going to be the tough one I guessIt's pretty simple now. We need to Falcons to lose two out of three. They have T.B., N.O. and Carolina. We need Detroit to lose 1 of 2. And we need to win out
That was with the G.B. loss. There are a couple of other less realistic possibilities, but that's our best shot. Atlanta has three tough games, we need them to lose two, we need Detroit to lose one, hopefully Rodgers will play against them week 17Is it that simple now? No matter who wins in GB/Car? Atl going to be the tough one I guess
tall order but stranger things have happenedIt's pretty simple now. We need to Falcons to lose two out of three. They have T.B., N.O. and Carolina. We need Detroit to lose 1 of 2. And we need to win out
Yeah, that was crazy. i was getting pissed at Romo and Nance for not realizing what they were looking at. You could tell right away it was going to be overturned. Shitty rule.Lol. The Patriots do it again.
Toughest part is still us winning 3 more. I just don't think we are going to do it, but great to have a chance. But if Atl loses Monday night I don't see them winning both of the last two. Let's go TB, ARod and Cowboys!!!That was with the G.B. loss. There are a couple of other less realistic possibilities, but that's our best shot. Atlanta has three tough games, we need them to lose two, we need Detroit to lose one, hopefully Rodgers will play against them week 17
Yeah, that was crazy. i was getting pissed at Romo and Nance for not realizing what they were looking at. You could tell right away it was going to be overturned. Shitty rule.
Gotta be careful with kickoffs tonight. Cordarelle is about as good as it gets.
Terrible rule and the NFL IS in no hurry to fix it. If a running back takes a handoff and does the same thing it is a touch down.Yeah, that was crazy. i was getting pissed at Romo and Nance for not realizing what they were looking at. You could tell right away it was going to be overturned. Shitty rule.
While I agree the rule sucks, the difference in those other league is the player is down when the knee touchesthe rule definitely needs to be fixed. When logic has to be ignored for the rule to work. You should fix the rule.
Loved what Tony Dungy said. In High school football, Pee Wee Football, College ball, all football that isnt the NFL that is a catch.
Just food for thought.
While I agree the rule sucks, the difference in those other league is the player is down when the knee touches
The ruling would be the same since they ruled he didn't maintain control all the way to the ground. My argument is how could NY tell if James didn't have his hand under the ball.What would have happened if the Patriots DB touched him before he put the ball across the line.