- Thread starter
- #1
Throughout the sharks history, when they score 3 they win in the PO's. I think in all the nabby years since 06-07, they only lost a total of 1 game when they scored at least 3. That's a total of 44 games. If they scored 3, they were 15-1 (16-1 if you include this year). That's probably the best winning % when scoring 3 goals in the league, which means that it's not the goalie's fault. That also means they scored 2 or fewer in 28 of 44 games (64%).
Many people blamed nabby for the PO losses, but that trend seems to continue with niemi too, and would likely be true no matter who is in net.
Here are the % of 3+ goal games for the past several champions:
Chicago in 2010: 22 games, 15 games with 3+ goals = 68%
Pitt in 2009: 24 games, 17 games with 3+ goals = 71%
Det in 2008: 22 games, 15 games with 3+ goal = 68%
Ana in 2007: 21 games, 12 games with 3+ goals = 57%
Car in 2006: 25 games, 15 games with 3+ goals = 60%
Tam in 2004: 23 games, 14 games with 3+ goals = 61%
NJ in 2003: 24 games, 14 games with 3+ goals = 58%
Det in 2002: 23 games, 14 games with 3+ goals = 61%
I'm sure I could go on for a while...
the sharks since 06-07 are at 36%.
On top of that: here are their PP ranks throughout the playoffs since the lockout:
2005-6: 10th out of 16 (15% = 11 of 72)
2006-7: 14th out of 16 (7% = 4 of 57)
2007-8: 12th out of 16 (12% = 8 of 56)
2008-9: 8th out of 16 (16% = 4 of 24)
2009-10: 9th out of 16 (19% = 14 of 71)
2010-11: 16th out of 16 so far (0% = 0 for 7).
That's a total of 41 of 287 = 14.3%. Based on this year's regular season, that would have been good for 28th.
Interestingly, the PO before Jumbo arrived (2003-4), the sharks ranked 7th in PP, their best ranking.
Over this period, they sharks have had a variety of top Dmen including campbell, boyle, ehrhoff, Blake and others who captain the PP. 3 of those 4 have already won a cup (and one may soon), so it's not them.
So what does all this mean?
Well, who plays the vast majority of the PP time over that period and 'captains' the PP? Who absorbs the vast majority of the salary? Who MUST be counted on to provide consistent scoring but has regularly failed by being so up and down?
There are only 2 common denominators. Only 2 players that have been the same over the least 6 years. Only 2 guys with well-earned reputations for disappearing in the PO's and playing without fire. Only 2 guys...
If the sharks want a cup, they must jettison Jumbo and Patty.
Many people blamed nabby for the PO losses, but that trend seems to continue with niemi too, and would likely be true no matter who is in net.
Here are the % of 3+ goal games for the past several champions:
Chicago in 2010: 22 games, 15 games with 3+ goals = 68%
Pitt in 2009: 24 games, 17 games with 3+ goals = 71%
Det in 2008: 22 games, 15 games with 3+ goal = 68%
Ana in 2007: 21 games, 12 games with 3+ goals = 57%
Car in 2006: 25 games, 15 games with 3+ goals = 60%
Tam in 2004: 23 games, 14 games with 3+ goals = 61%
NJ in 2003: 24 games, 14 games with 3+ goals = 58%
Det in 2002: 23 games, 14 games with 3+ goals = 61%
I'm sure I could go on for a while...
the sharks since 06-07 are at 36%.
On top of that: here are their PP ranks throughout the playoffs since the lockout:
2005-6: 10th out of 16 (15% = 11 of 72)
2006-7: 14th out of 16 (7% = 4 of 57)
2007-8: 12th out of 16 (12% = 8 of 56)
2008-9: 8th out of 16 (16% = 4 of 24)
2009-10: 9th out of 16 (19% = 14 of 71)
2010-11: 16th out of 16 so far (0% = 0 for 7).
That's a total of 41 of 287 = 14.3%. Based on this year's regular season, that would have been good for 28th.
Interestingly, the PO before Jumbo arrived (2003-4), the sharks ranked 7th in PP, their best ranking.
Over this period, they sharks have had a variety of top Dmen including campbell, boyle, ehrhoff, Blake and others who captain the PP. 3 of those 4 have already won a cup (and one may soon), so it's not them.
So what does all this mean?
Well, who plays the vast majority of the PP time over that period and 'captains' the PP? Who absorbs the vast majority of the salary? Who MUST be counted on to provide consistent scoring but has regularly failed by being so up and down?
There are only 2 common denominators. Only 2 players that have been the same over the least 6 years. Only 2 guys with well-earned reputations for disappearing in the PO's and playing without fire. Only 2 guys...
If the sharks want a cup, they must jettison Jumbo and Patty.