- Thread starter
- #21
handicappers
FAT STACKS BITCHES
First Mavericks season with at least four 40+ win games. IMpressive
First Mavericks season with at least four 40+ win games. IMpressive
Or even better a young Magic Johnson, which is a better comp IMO.Doesn't hurt to have a young Larry Bird
Carlisle is a top 5 coach in the league.tons of fun. Carlisle is highly under rated in all this. He's built the perfect bench/role players and all the guys seem to be buying in. moving Hardaway to starting lineup was brilliant move on his part.
I don't see Magic, but either way, you could make the argument that at the same age, the kid is better than either was, which is insane considering one is the greatest PG ever and the other the 2nd greatest SFOr even better a young Magic Johnson, which is a better comp IMO.
Needs to get better at defense to be an all time great IMO, but that's about effort and he's very young still.
Carlisle is a top 5 coach in the league.
That's how some fans are. They think they know more than the actual NBA lifer getting paid millionsThe number of Mavs “fans” that have been demanding his firing over the past few years because he “doesn’t trust young players” is damn near comical. I had to leave one site before I got banned because I was spending more time defending Rick and calling these GM wannabes morons then talking legitimate hoops.
Luka looks to be special.
But let's pump the brakes on the Magic/Bird comparisons. No need to put that kind of pressure on the kid.
Maybe, instead of being the next Magic or Bird, he can just be the first Luka Doncic and wait until the end of his career (or at least until he's been around awhile longer) to see where he stacks up.
Having said that, (I'm gonna go and make a comparison lol) I think he's more Magic than Bird. Aside from being a point guard like Magic...Magic was more athletic than Bird and Luka is more athletic than both.