- Thread starter
- #581
Shane and I have agreed to a trade:
Shane trades 13th pick for Sushi's 15th and $1.
Okay, since we are still talking about this. Let's just be honest, the picks you gave Mebert do not matter at all there is still good players available at nearly every position. Fact is no matter who he picks now the value is not nearly what he had in Deion. Why not trade Woodson who was actually $9 or Bruce Smith who was $13? Neither of those players are as valuable in the draft as Deion is and he would have been saving more money with either of them.
If you just step back and look at this trade for what it is you will see this was as one-sided a trade as we have ever had. The 10th and 12th round picks mean absolutely nothing, so he got $5, Five Dollars for what most people consider the best Corner available. To think Mark Haynes is even in the same league as Deion is insane, he's not top 50 CB available in this draft.
Even if he turns that $10 into a better offensive line it will not have the impact that Deion would have had. So now instead of a few $5 linemen he can get a few $8 linemen. As someone who has been in every NFL draft we have ever done I can tell you, Deion holds more weight than a better than average offensive line and it's not close.
Like I said before, it's not a big deal, let's just continue to have fun with our drafts I do not wanna argue with anyone but to try to somehow show this trade wasn't one-sided is ridiculous...
MaybeCan I have Deion?
Except you can't ignore the picks. Without them you are looking at half the trade.
Currently I sit $2 less than I did before, but with 2 less players to draft.
I traded Sander and the 21st and 22nd rounds for Gary Zimmermann, Larry Little, and Mark Haynes and I am STILL in a better money situation than before.
If you think a dominant left side of the line is less valuable than the difference between Haynes and Sanders you are plain wrong. The fact is you flew off the handle when the trade was 30% complete and are too stubborn to retract it now. You can say UK got the better of it, but one of the most lop sided ever? You have no ground to make that stand.
100%. Let's look at it another way, and I'm gonna name drop, but it doesn't matter because every guy here knows this guy is on the board. Let's say instead of 3 players with the money he saved, Mebert took CB Mark Haynes and DT Mean Joe Greene with the two picks he got from me. He would still have the same amount of money he had BEFORE the trade, and he'd still have his own picks, which he didn't have to use for those two players. So would Deion and a couple of end of round picks for Mark Haynes and Mean Joe be lopsided? If so, Ronnie Lott for LT is. Look at the difference to his overall team. I think it works out great for MebertExcept you can't ignore the picks. Without them you are looking at half the trade.
Currently I sit $2 less than I did before, but with 2 less players to draft.
I traded Sander and the 21st and 22nd rounds for Gary Zimmermann, Larry Little, and Mark Haynes and I am STILL in a better money situation than before.
If you think a dominant left side of the line is less valuable than the difference between Haynes and Sanders you are plain wrong. The fact is you flew off the handle when the trade was 30% complete and are too stubborn to retract it now. You can say UK got the better of it, but one of the most lop sided ever? You have no ground to make that stand.
This is another example of why I think Mebert did well. He cleared $13, which is what he wanted done. If he traded an OTC pick, not only would he lose the pick, he'd only gain $1. That's the going rate. He got $5, which is no worse than 2nd round pick moneyShane and I have agreed to a trade:
Shane trades 13th pick for Sushi's 15th and $1.
Okay, since we are still talking about this. Let's just be honest, the picks you gave Mebert do not matter at all there is still good players available at nearly every position. Fact is no matter who he picks now the value is not nearly what he had in Deion. Why not trade Woodson who was actually $9 or Bruce Smith who was $13? Neither of those players are as valuable in the draft as Deion is and he would have been saving more money with either of them.
If you just step back and look at this trade for what it is you will see this was as one-sided a trade as we have ever had. The 10th and 12th round picks mean absolutely nothing, so he got $5, Five Dollars for what most people consider the best Corner available. To think Mark Haynes is even in the same league as Deion is insane, he's not top 50 CB available in this draft.
Even if he turns that $10 into a better offensive line it will not have the impact that Deion would have had. So now instead of a few $5 linemen he can get a few $8 linemen. As someone who has been in every NFL draft we have ever done I can tell you, Deion holds more weight than a better than average offensive line and it's not close.
Like I said before, it's not a big deal, let's just continue to have fun with our drafts I do not wanna argue with anyone but to try to somehow show this trade wasn't one-sided is ridiculous...
Those 3 players combined do not = Deion Sanders. Not in the eyes of the people voting. I promise...
I could name two players you could have drafted for $6 less than Zimmerman & Little that would have been way more close in value than Haynes is to Deion. The thing you aren't understanding is a dominating secondary is way more important to the people voting than a dominating offensive line and sadly it's not even close.
Bob Sanders is a stud too. You also said something along the lines of hands down lol....Woodson/Haynes/Butler > Sanders/Bailey/Harrison
I said secondary...
I build my team like I would build a winning team, and oline is second only to QB on offense in football. And an elite pass rush is just as important to the secondary as cb's and I have 2 of the best rushing
Who we waitin on? lolzzz