The 4 remaining playoff quarterbacks

[GNG]

numbers or no numbers

1)Rodgers
2)Brady
3)Wilson
4) Luck
for me

 

[sonnyblack65]

numbers or no numbers

1)Brady
2) Rodgers
3)Wilson
4) Luck
for me

 

[flyerhawk]

One thing that annoys me is people here (and the talking heads) Dismiss all of Lucks turnovers. He had the most turnovers on this list. He had the most turnovers in the league this year (for people not named Cutler) yet he gets a pass for some reason.

People say he has no talent around him, but thats also not true. His weapons are legit, TY is a star, Allen and Fleener are both above average TE's. Wayne is a future HOF. Moncreif is a nice young find.

He's a great qb yes, but he automatically gets a pass into the arodgers brady conversation, when it would take brady and rod 3 years combined to equal the amount of to's luck had this year.

John Clayton was on 710 ESPN yesterday and said that Andrew Luck would go 16-0 if he was playing for Seattle.

 

[GNG]

John Clayton was on 710 ESPN yesterday and said that Andrew Luck would go 16-0 if he was playing for Seattle.

I'm not sure about Luck but Rodgers or Brady could.

 

[packerzrule]

I'm not sure about Luck but Rodgers or Brady could.

YAHTZEE

 

[gowazzu02]

John Clayton was on 710 ESPN yesterday and said that Andrew Luck would go 16-0 if he was playing for Seattle.

Bologna, If you say that, your saying that Wilson essentially lost those 4 games this year....

how about the games that Indy lost. And all those turn overs.

 

[geezer]

 

[sonnyblack65]

Jelly is coming for ya, you meanie

 

[geezer]

 

[geezer]

Jelly is coming for ya, you meanie

He has to be nice or I will sell those used and unwashed jockstraps to another Luck fan.

 

[flyerhawk]

Bologna, If you say that, your saying that Wilson essentially lost those 4 games this year....

how about the games that Indy lost. And all those turn overs.

Andrew Luck had twice as many turnovers as the entire Seahawks team.

 

[Southieinnc]

John Clayton was on 710 ESPN yesterday and said that Andrew Luck would go 16-0 if he was playing for Seattle.

Brady has already done that with NE.....

At this point (today), I'll go:

Wilson
Brady
Luck
Rodgers

 

[Manning2Luck_uJelly]

John Clayton was on 710 ESPN yesterday and said that Andrew Luck would go 16-0 if he was playing for Seattle.

I dunno about 16-0, but they'd definitely be a better offense.

 

[Manning2Luck_uJelly]

Andrew Luck had twice as many turnovers as the entire Seahawks team.

That's what happens when one has to take risks and carry a subpar team.

 

[geezer]

He wouldn'y play. Pete would bench him for all those turnovers.

 

[JMR]

I dunno about 16-0, but they'd definitely be a better offense.

I guess in this hypothetical we also assume Luck no longer turns the ball over more than anyone but Cutler?

 

[geezer]

Luck is good, no argument. But he does need to work on the turnover stuff. I expect turnovers by Luck will decide the game with the Patriots.

 

[Gooch1034]

I dunno about 16-0, but they'd definitely be a better offense.

Hard to say really. I think Wilson would do just fine with the Indy offense. Luck cant run like Wilson for one and that O-line in Seattle may spell big trouble for a QB like Luck? On the other hand, Luck's INTs are brought up often and I would like to see how many of those INTs were the receivers fault. I watched 80% of the Colts games and I know there were a handful that weren't his fault but that's arguable too.

 

[flyerhawk]

I dunno about 16-0, but they'd definitely be a better offense.

Probably. And probably a worse defense as Luck would turn the ball over more frequently.

That's what happens when one has to take risks and carry a subpar team.

Is that why he has 12 fumbles?

 

[cezero]

Andrew Luck had twice as many turnovers as the entire Seahawks team.

facts don't matter to morons like john clayton and the shrieking herd of morons on here who think anything like him on this subject.

luck would probably put up better numbers than wilson, of course, but he'd need a substantially better offense than the seahawks have right now to even go 13-3, much less 16-0.