Suits

[calsnowskier]

Anyone watch this show?

Actually a REALLY good show.

 

[Hank Kingsley]

I do.

It has it's hokey moments though.

 

[calsnowskier]

I do.

It has it's hokey moments though.

Of course. But that keeps it light and not too heavy. Legal dramas can be dry as hell.

While I REALLY like the show, last night's ep was one of the worst of the shows run yet. Everyone acted out of character. Mikes closing argument was so bad, I was waiting for him to "wake up" from his dream. It was so un-Mike-like.

 

[Kevin12773]

I'd like to be in a Donna/Rachel sammich

 

[chf]

I put this show down as a guilty pleasure. Should hate it. But I watch it anyway. A guy watching this show should have his man card revoked.

 

[Hank Kingsley]

I'd like to be in a Donna/Rachel sammich

Bella Bella Donna yes, fat assed, knock kneed Rachel nope......

 

[Hank Kingsley]

I put this show down as a guilty pleasure. Should hate it. But I watch it anyway. A guy watching this show should have his man card revoked.

Nothing wrong with guilty pleasures.

And for the record I also like and never miss Castle.

 

[chf]

Bella Bella Donna yes, fat assed, knock kneed Rachel nope......

You have a weird definition of fat.

 

[Hank Kingsley]

View attachment 92181

You have a weird definition of fat.

Probably starved herself for a month for that.

And it is from the front. She has a J Lo going on back there...

 

[chf]

Still not fat.

 

[SDGuy73]

I've watched this show from the start. I enjoy it. Donna!

 

[calsnowskier]

View attachment 92181

You have a weird definition of fat.

She is about a Hollywood 6 or 7, but they try to carry her off as a Hollywood 9.

She is a real-world 8 probably. Most definitely do-able, but nothing that you would risk your marriage over.

 

[chf]

Heh.

Only on the interwebs.

'Hotter girls at my gym!'

And to be clear, it's not even like she goes on my 'list.' But I always get a kick out of a bunch of middle aged men down-ranking women online.

 

[Kevin12773]

Nothing wrong with guilty pleasures.

And for the record I also like and never miss Castle.

Castle is a great one for sure

 

[calsnowskier]

Heh.

Only on the interwebs.

'Hotter girls at my gym!'

And to be clear, it's not even like she goes on my 'list.' But I always get a kick out of a bunch of middle aged men down-ranking women online.

I always get a kick out people laughing at guys ranking girls.

We are never ranking them according to who we would or who we wouldnt. We are rating them based on their relative hotness compared to other "celebs" or other photographed females.

If we were rating by "Wood" or "Wood Not" (binary), I think we would be rather hard pressed to find any "wood not"s. Heck, if Rosanne were in my bed, begging for my cock, I would not kick her out. I would still rate her as a 2 (at best).

 

[handicappers]

I couldn't get into it. Too ridiculous of a plot.

 

[calsnowskier]

I couldn't get into it. Too ridiculous of a plot.

That is TV nowadays. If you dont have a "ridiculous plot", you are just rehashing what has already been done 100 times already.

However, photographic memories are a lot like multiple personalities. It is shown on TV/in movies all the time, yet actually hardly ever actually exists in real life (granted, photo memory is MUCH more common than mult personalities).

 

[chf]

I always get a kick out people laughing at guys ranking girls.

We are never ranking them according to who we would or who we wouldnt. We are rating them based on their relative hotness compared to other "celebs" or other photographed females.

If we were rating by "Wood" or "Wood Not" (binary), I think we would be rather hard pressed to find any "wood not"s. Heck, if Rosanne were in my bed, begging for my cock, I would not kick her out. I would still rate her as a 2 (at best).

Right, and if we're going to parse whether Natalie Portman is hotter than Margot Robbie, then I'm fully on board. Why not?

But it doesn't stop there often (in online-verse anyway or RL if a lot of alcohol is involved).

To to revisit. A poster said he's love to be in a Rachel/Donna sandwich.

Hank said that he'd be into Donna, but not the 'fat-ass' Rachel.

That's what makes me laugh. Now sure, I'm WAAAY reading other message boards threads into this one, where guys stay stupid shvt like 'I wouldn't fvck Rachel with YOUR dick!' etc etc...

But that actress doesn't have a fat ass.

It's not really fair though. ALL the men on the show are at least 9's.




But to be fair, I'm constitutionally unable to not disagree with Hank about anything. So in 20 years, when Meghan Markle DOES have a fat-ass, I'll be arguing that it's slim.

 

[Hank Kingsley]

View attachment 92183

Still not fat.

I've never been wrong before.

 

[Hank Kingsley]

I always get a kick out people laughing at guys ranking girls.

We are never ranking them according to who we would or who we wouldnt. We are rating them based on their relative hotness compared to other "celebs" or other photographed females.

If we were rating by "Wood" or "Wood Not" (binary), I think we would be rather hard pressed to find any "wood not"s. Heck, if Rosanne were in my bed, begging for my cock, I would not kick her out. I would still rate her as a 2 (at best).

I ain't ranking, I'm just saying....

As far as being drunk and upside down on the couch....... Or a hole in a fur coat......