So question for some of the guys against a RB at 17

[Sharkinva]

@gkekoa and @ehb5 So let me ask.... if the call was taking a QB at 17, or a RB.... what would you rather see happen??

 

[Hambombs]

@gkekoa and @ehb5 So let me ask.... if the call was taking a QB at 17, or a RB.... what would you rather see happen??

RB

 

[skinsdad62]

Rb

 

[ehb5]

RB.

 

[Ruzious]

RB. Picking a QB at 17 would send all kinds of confusing messages.

 

[gkekoa]

RB easily. While I don't value the position of RB as a first round value, I at least value what I expect to be successful. I don't see success in the future of any QB in this draft.

 

[deanpet21]

RB easily. While I don't value the position of RB as a first round value, I at least value what I expect to be successful. I don't see success in the future of any QB in this draft.

That is pretty bold saying none of the QB's in this draft will be successful. If QB is taken at 17 then obviously the KC era is done here. So KC will play the 2017 season and the new QB will start the 2018 season. Guys like Trib and Mahomes need a year to sit anyways.

I do want a RB at 17 but you cant blame the Skins for taking a QB at 17 if hey feel they are too far apart on a LTD with KC.

 

[Stymietee]

I'm going to pick QB but only because I'm curious to see just how many feet Bruce Allen's ass can stand up in it at one time. (Bitch slaps are bonuses)

 

[redskin4209]

QB or RB that's easy. I going RB and that RB is Mixon

 

[Hambombs]

QB or RB that's easy. I going RB and that RB is Mixon

I'm on the same train