DHoey
Well-Known Member
Watching Browne in high school, I would have never guessed that he would be that bad.SC scheduled the number 1 team in the country. Our QB smelled was shit tho
Watching Browne in high school, I would have never guessed that he would be that bad.SC scheduled the number 1 team in the country. Our QB smelled was shit tho
Washington won their division. SC is top 10. In all honesty. I think SC beats OSU in their back yard this year.This isn't OSU with Zeke. I think Washington has the better RB in Gaskins. And I don't see anyone on OSU's roster that comes close to Ross at WR. I put Browning over Barrett.I don't think its close on offense. Defensively the two may be a push.
I didn't know Montana and Fresno St were powerhouses a couple years ago....I guess I need to read more
I think they were hoping for a little better team than 2016 Rutgers. I mean, didn't Michigan have the same record as Rutgers in 2013?
That's not fair, the B1G is full of cupcakes!BS!!! You know exactly what you're doing when you schedule Rutgers. Putting a cupcake on your schedule just so you can say you got a win from the BIG.
Really? I forgot, UW must be the only one to schedule FCS/lower division schools? As opposed to power houses such as Tulsa/Bowling Green?
By someone, you mean Colorado lost to Michigan and USC lost to Bama. Do BYU or Kansas St count as someone?I don't care what you say.. improved? That may be, but usc still got their asses handed to them by Bama 52-6. Wash can prove me wrong in the playoffs, but until I see a PAC team actually beat someone OOC, I'm not buying in.
Not sure if you are trolling or not, Rutgers was in Bowl games 9 out of 10 years before we scheduled them.
And since naming Darnold as the starting QB........... I don't see OSU matching up with Washington this year. I'm not actually sure you guys have watched many PAC games tbhI don't care what you say.. improved? That may be, but usc still got their asses handed to them by Bama 52-6. Wash can prove me wrong in the playoffs, but until I see a PAC team actually beat someone OOC, I'm not buying in.
Nah. They added them in March of 2014. The previous year Rutgers went 6-7 and 2-5 in a weak AAC but yeah nice try.
To be fair SC and UCLA are two of three teams. To never play an FCS team and both are PAC.But @ least Tulsa & B.G. are FBS programs. Montana is an FCS program. Just about all teams play a few cupcakes each year. I just wish all FBS teams would stop playing FCS teams though. And I'm pretty sure Iowa fans would agree!
We can say the same about Bowling Green. Does that make them our signature OOC match-up?
By someone, you mean Colorado lost to Michigan and USC lost to Bama. Do BYU or Kansas St count as someone?
Well other than Rutgers was playing in a higher tier conference than Bowling Green.
No shit you don't. It's clear you haven't watched a game east of the Rocky Mountains this year.And since naming Darnold as the starting QB........... I don't see OSU matching up with Washington this year. I'm not actually sure you guys have watched many PAC games tbh
Neither did I but it is what it is. He'll be transferring after the season. Maybe he finds a better fit. Maybe he doesn't. Darnold pushed the starting job through camp. But Helton couldn't risk Browne transfering at that point. It was a tough call. I'm just thankful for Darnold tbhWatching Browne in high school, I would have never guessed that he would be that bad.
UW didn't play either. PAC teams did have quality programs like Texas and Notre Dame on their schedules this year and usually you can count on them being good teams. Unfortunately, they weren't this year.Congrats on beating BYU and K-State.
No cookies but some of those Colorado brownies would be niceSo what do want, a cookie? Actually I didn't realize they have never played an FCS team.