So... I had Rivers/Keenan/Tyreek Tonight

[Chef99]

I agree mike Williams avg like what 2.2 catches a game. And your banking playoff hopes on him

Thing is, I don't think it's fair judging a strategy like that, especially dismissing it as a mistake. We've all done some odd things in the way of strategy; some work, some don't. Ultimately, it's the team's success that counts.

 

[richig07]

Fairbairn with 13 by mid-2nd quarter is helping to smooth over Keenan's 0 a tad. Projection back to 106.

 

[SteelersPride]

Thing is, I don't think it's fair judging a strategy like that, especially dismissing it as a mistake. We've all done some odd things in the way of strategy; some work, some don't. Ultimately, it's the team's success that counts.

agree there too, but theres no logic that says mike williams was a good play. Unless it was a touchdown only league

since the bye
1,0,2,4,3,3, coming into last night
averaging 2.16 catches per game
averaging 35.6 yards per game
3 tds total, 2 in one game..so 0.5 tds per game
and 3.16 targets per game

 

[SteelersPride]

i edited that post a bit with some stats @Chef99

 

[Chef99]

agree there too, but theres no logic that says mike williams was a good play

Logic?? Did you say logic??

 

[Chef99]

i edited that post a bit with some stats @Chef99

What can I say, bud; I don't disagree with you. Sometimes crazy works.

 

[SteelersPride]

What can I say, bud; I don't disagree with you. Sometimes crazy works.

that it does, this was one of those times.....

 

[SteelersPride]

FWIW, one guy on fantasy pros called it

 

[MilkSpiller22]

Thing is, I don't think it's fair judging a strategy like that, especially dismissing it as a mistake. We've all done some odd things in the way of strategy; some work, some don't. Ultimately, it's the team's success that counts.

Bad strategy can work out... but that doesn't change that it is bad strategy...

 

[Chef99]

Bad strategy can work out... but that doesn't change that it is bad strategy...

In your opinion, it's bad strategy. Dude, if you are fighting for a playoff life and figuring out your best chance to win, is that bad strategy?

In Barbarians, I went with the Houston D and Lamar Miller. Now, Miller got injured, but how 'bout that Texans' D? The Jets are making them look silly at the moment. Consequently, I am getting my ass kicked. However, I went with logic. 'nuff said.

 

[Chef99]

Lol, it doesn't help that my opponent, Trudem, has Hopkins.

 

[MilkSpiller22]

In your opinion, it's bad strategy. Dude, if you are fighting for a playoff life and figuring out your best chance to win, is that bad strategy?

In Barbarians, I went with the Houston D and Lamar Miller. Now, Miller got injured, but how 'bout that Texans' D? The Jets are making them look silly at the moment. Consequently, I am getting my ass kicked. However, I went with logic. 'nuff said.

Sure, we all have opinions... and maybe mine is so strong here that i would think that this is black and white bad strategy...

What you did, is not bad strategy... Starting a defense vs the Jets is generally good strategy... and starting Lamar mIller after a few top 10 RB weeks of production is also a great move...

I just dont get why people think that just because things work out, that they did the right thing... and i also dont get why it is so wrong to call people out on bad strategic play...

I am not saying that i never do stupid things... i do, all the time... play hunches, or whatever...

all i am saying is that if you are starting Keenan Allen, then it is stupid to start Mike Williams too...