- Thread starter
- #1
Sam Sportboy
Can't all be winners kid
So I feel like I have this right and I doubt I'll change it so what's the point right? Well FantasyPros is trying to say I should start Gordon/Shady over Diggs/Brieda. Now I can see the Brieda part of it (I can see arguments fer both sides) but if you were ever gonna start Diggs this would be the week and even though tGiants suck, there are so many mouths to feed I feel like Josh might luck into a TD (Brady just missed him on a long one last week) but other than that I see him as a sit. Here is how I have it now:
I can see the Brieda thing looking like chasing points but I think he has a higher floor that Shady until we see how DWill coming back pans out. I just can't see what FP sees. Check out my other league. FP is telling me to sit Sutton and Fuller and start Mixon and Cooks. I know Cooks hasn't been ruled out yet but damn, is this them thinking I'm point chasing????? Here is that line up. Shit, if I was gonna sit anybody it would be Gordon (who I will play this week with these options). Side note: I hate Joe Mixon.
Bottom Line: I feel FP is full of shit this week.
I can see the Brieda thing looking like chasing points but I think he has a higher floor that Shady until we see how DWill coming back pans out. I just can't see what FP sees. Check out my other league. FP is telling me to sit Sutton and Fuller and start Mixon and Cooks. I know Cooks hasn't been ruled out yet but damn, is this them thinking I'm point chasing????? Here is that line up. Shit, if I was gonna sit anybody it would be Gordon (who I will play this week with these options). Side note: I hate Joe Mixon.
Bottom Line: I feel FP is full of shit this week.