- Thread starter
- #1
averagejoe
You fell victim to one of the classic blunders.
After watching the Nucks game shootout loss, I just wonder why shootouts are not discussed more (by the team, by the fan, or by the media)?
It's obviously a staple of the NHL now and IMO this is an area of the game that the Hawks need to improve on. Four of the Hawks six OT losses are because of their failure to put the puck in the net in the shootout. In the Nucks game, the shootout went 8 rounds. (Let me just add that watching the Sedin's take their shootouts at Raanta was unbelievably hilarious and yet pitiful.)
When the players are introduced they'll show a graphic of their "career" shootout percentages which I feel is a little misleading. Here's where we are as of today:
Kane = 8 shots ZERO goals. Hossa = 3 shots ZERO goals. Terrible!
I remember a long shootout contest last year and Rozsival made a real nice goal. Wouldn't it be to a team's advantage to use a guy like Rosie since a goalie may not have a clue how he'll shoot?
I say let Sharp lead off a shootout since he has the best percentage this season. Put the other team in the hole.
Another reason I mention this is because some shootouts like in the Vancouver game extend beyond the 3-player minimum. We need to wrap these kind of games up. It shouldn't take a team like the Hawks - with all of the weapons we have on offense - go into a 4th, 5th or 8th frame of a shootout.
Am I blowing this way out of proportion?
It's obviously a staple of the NHL now and IMO this is an area of the game that the Hawks need to improve on. Four of the Hawks six OT losses are because of their failure to put the puck in the net in the shootout. In the Nucks game, the shootout went 8 rounds. (Let me just add that watching the Sedin's take their shootouts at Raanta was unbelievably hilarious and yet pitiful.)
When the players are introduced they'll show a graphic of their "career" shootout percentages which I feel is a little misleading. Here's where we are as of today:

Kane = 8 shots ZERO goals. Hossa = 3 shots ZERO goals. Terrible!
I remember a long shootout contest last year and Rozsival made a real nice goal. Wouldn't it be to a team's advantage to use a guy like Rosie since a goalie may not have a clue how he'll shoot?
I say let Sharp lead off a shootout since he has the best percentage this season. Put the other team in the hole.
Another reason I mention this is because some shootouts like in the Vancouver game extend beyond the 3-player minimum. We need to wrap these kind of games up. It shouldn't take a team like the Hawks - with all of the weapons we have on offense - go into a 4th, 5th or 8th frame of a shootout.
Am I blowing this way out of proportion?
Last edited by a moderator: