- Thread starter
- #1
Blackshirt
Who is Mike Riley?
someone brought this up, and I am curious to what everyone's stance is on it...
Is our current running back rotation/repetition spread good or bad? Because we are currently giving Ameer about 3-4 snaps, then Cross comes in for about 3-4, then Newby came in for about 3-4. We are giving a good mixture of backs reps and looks, which is giving us always fresh legs in the backfield and not worn down. My concern however is not letting a running back hit a rhythm or gain confidence. Why don't we leave one in for a bit and let him get a groove? Why does it seem that every time one hits a groove we yank him and put in a different back to carry the rock? What's more important here?
Is our current running back rotation/repetition spread good or bad? Because we are currently giving Ameer about 3-4 snaps, then Cross comes in for about 3-4, then Newby came in for about 3-4. We are giving a good mixture of backs reps and looks, which is giving us always fresh legs in the backfield and not worn down. My concern however is not letting a running back hit a rhythm or gain confidence. Why don't we leave one in for a bit and let him get a groove? Why does it seem that every time one hits a groove we yank him and put in a different back to carry the rock? What's more important here?