SEC SEC SEC

[blastfromthepast]

Oh my the ultimate chest pump.... clearly you are a closet SEC fan who is embarrassed of his own team. This statement has TROLL written all over it.

You literally have no clue what you are talking about. Have you noticed not one OSU fan or B10 fan has really jumped in here. Outside of Wamu talking about your "game attendance", it has been crickets. Surely B10 and OSU fans would want to light up an SEC troll like me right?

I think I can speak for most posters here (non-SEC and SEC fans), you have issues. I am not a closet SEC fan and have said I enjoy SEC sports.

So who is the real troll: someone defending the conference their team is in against repeated attacks OR someone who repeatedly posts over and over again in an attempt to annoy SEC posters? You and I both know that you are here to argue and pick fights with SEC posters. You are a text book definition of a troll.

You know there are SEC team fans here yet you continue your mindless non-sense. There is literally no way you walk away from this debate looking like a competent poster. I am sure fellow OSU and B10 fans are have secondary embarassment reading this rubbish. You refuse to answer my questions and you have been exposed for the troll you are. I getting tired of it actually.

For the 3rd time...why are you here?

Mens Football: 6/10 championships
Mens Track: 8/10 championships
Mens Basketball: 1/10 championships
Mens Baseball: 7/10 championships
Womens Softball: 2/10 championships
Womens Track: 6/10 championships
Womens Basketball: 4/10 championships
Womens Volleyball: 2/10 championships

Out of 80 championships from the 8 major sports I listed above (feel free to add or subtract a major sport), the SEC has won 36 of the 80.
Mens = 22/40
Womens = 14/40

Hilarious that you try to defend the SEC performance with losses by aTm and Ole Miss.

I am not defending losses, I am proving you wrong and did so. You made an idiotic comment in post 198 and I corrected you...again.

Not only do you have issues withe the SEC, you are dishonest. You know Ole Miss was competitive in the playoffs. Any college football fan would agree to that. If Ole Miss was in the B12 or ACC, you would have claimed they are competitive. You are trying to defend your pathetic positions and you are making it worse. Still waiting on your B12 answers to my questions.

Wow for someone claims to be a team only fan (that clearly is ashamed of his team) sure pulled out the SEC SEC SEC conference chant.

How did I pull out the SEC chant? Why am I ashamed of my team? Why does it matter so much to you that you have brought it up over 5 times?

You called Sankey a moron and now showed everyone who insanely out of touch you are with college sports. I proved you wrong...again.

For an alleged OSU fan who hates Michigan enough to have a childish avatar with a character releaving himself on the "M", you are literally confused. Michigan is OSU's rival...not the SEC. Instead of bashing Michigan, over 70% of your posts are sophmoric insults and emotional meltdowns regarding the SEC. I highly doubt any Michigan poster here would believe you to be a die-hard OSU fan given your post history on this thread.

Are you a bigger fan or your team or the SEC?

Yup...my team. I have said that a thousand times. I even admitted the 3 year "decline" didn't bother me. I actually said the B10 has been better than the SEC the past 3 years. What else do you want?

You literally confessed to the whole board you would have been embarrased. You are a B10 conference first troll. Case closed!

Well you have chest pumped SEC continuously and its peeps with your team although from your words, you are team first and SEC means little????

Correct. I am a team first fan and have to look up statistics to disprove your constant attacks. I have been quite successful and your anger at losing this debate is evident.

Is this a pro or con SEC thread? I could not tell because you change like a chameleon when convenient.

Like Husker said with his new B10 thread, it can serve as both. I do believe most posters are here to have fun and take jabs at the SEC, but trolls like you and Funbags take it to an unhealthly level. Are you ever going to answer my questions about Funbags?

Make you deal. You don't post on this thread and I don't post on the B10 thread? Sounds fair correct? I am trying to help you save what little pride you have left. You have been completely humiliated in this debate and you know it.

 

[AJBuckeye]

You literally have no clue what you are talking about. Have you noticed not one OSU fan or B10 fan has really jumped in here. Outside of Wamu talking about your "game attendance", it has been crickets. Surely B10 and OSU fans would want to light up an SEC troll like me right?

I think I can speak for most posters here (non-SEC and SEC fans), you have issues. I am not a closet SEC fan and have said I enjoy SEC sports.

So who is the real troll: someone defending the conference their team is in against repeated attacks OR someone who repeatedly posts over and over again in an attempt to annoy SEC posters? You and I both know that you are here to argue and pick fights with SEC posters. You are a text book definition of a troll.

You know there are SEC team fans here yet you continue your mindless non-sense. There is literally no way you walk away from this debate looking like a competent poster. I am sure fellow OSU and B10 fans are have secondary embarassment reading this rubbish. You refuse to answer my questions and you have been exposed for the troll you are. I getting tired of it actually.

For the 3rd time...why are you here?

I am not defending losses, I am proving you wrong and did so. You made an idiotic comment in post 198 and I corrected you...again.

Not only do you have issues withe the SEC, you are dishonest. You know Ole Miss was competitive in the playoffs. Any college football fan would agree to that. If Ole Miss was in the B12 or ACC, you would have claimed they are competitive. You are trying to defend your pathetic positions and you are making it worse. Still waiting on your B12 answers to my questions.


How did I pull out the SEC chant? Why am I ashamed of my team? Why does it matter so much to you that you have brought it up over 5 times?

You called Sankey a moron and now showed everyone who insanely out of touch you are with college sports. I proved you wrong...again.

For an alleged OSU fan who hates Michigan enough to have a chavatarildish with a character releaving himself on the "M", you are literally confused. Michigan is OSU's rival...not the SEC. Instead of bashing Michigan, over 70% of your posts are sophmoric insults and emotional meltdowns regarding the SEC. I highly doubt any Michigan poster here would believe you to be a die-hard OSU fan given your post history on this thread.


Yup...my team. I have said that a thousand times. I even admitted the 3 year "decline" didn't bother me. I actually said the B10 has been better than the SEC the past 3 years. What else do you want?

You literally confessed to the whole board you would have been embarrased. You are a B10 conference first troll. Case closed!


Correct. I am a team first fan and have to look up statistics to disprove your constant attacks. I have been quite successful and your anger at losing this debate is evident.


Like Husker said with his new B10 thread, it can serve as both. I do believe most posters are here to have fun and take jabs at the SEC, but trolls like you and Funbags take it to an unhealthly level. Are you ever going to answer my questions about Funbags?

Make you deal. You don't post on this thread and I don't post on the B10 thread? Sounds fair correct? I am trying to help you save what little pride you have left. You have been completely humiliated in this debate and you know it.

Wow and you think I have issues. Thus you are the only person on this thread that has endlessly accused me of being a troll. BTW the only person making those attacks on this thread calling people trolls is you. Well then maybe you are the problem.
Keep in mind you are the one that said this was an anti-SEC thread. Continuing to bring up how great the SEC is in football then extending it to other sports is trolling. Again you said this was an anti-SEC thread.

Then in you efforts to troll me you throw an endless barrage of insults in every response. I clearly have not done this to you other than your embarrassment to say what team you root for.

You state that you are in my head but my simple responses to you take a minute then you respond with a response to try to rip apart every word and then going back to every post I made. I truly applaud your effort but this only goes to show who is living in whos head.

Back to Sankey. He said that 7 teams deserve to be in the playoffs. His argument was that they have 7 teams in the top 14. You do realize that only the top 10 got in this year with 11 and 12 being Conference Champs. His argument is that Texas and Vandy deserved to be in ahead of Miami and Oregon. That is a moronic statement. Who makes moronic statements? Morons.

Finally no deal. This is an anti-SEC thread per your statement. BTW your endless rants are not a good look for you.

 

[blastfromthepast]

Wow and you think I have issues. Thus you are the only person on this thread that has endlessly accused me of being a troll.

And here we go!

Most posters on here are B10 fans. That being said, they would most likely agree with my observation. Its obvious as you have no intent on discuss the SEC at all. You are here to mock the entire conference and are angry that I pushed back.

BTW the only person making those attacks on this thread calling people trolls is you. Well then maybe you are the problem.

Again, you continue to dodge questions about your buddy Funbags.

I will ask a 5th time, was Funbags a troll or not?

Like I said, if SEC or ACC posters start bagging on the B10 over and over again on the new B10 thread, is it really trolling to argue back and not agree with it? Of course it isn't. I wouldn't be here if it wasn't for you constantly trying to blast the SEC over and over again.

Keep in mind you are the one that said this was an anti-SEC thread. Continuing to bring up how great the SEC is in football then extending it to other sports is trolling. Again you said this was an anti-SEC thread.

How did I bring up how great SEC football was? Post 197 states that I agree with you that the B10 has been better than the SEC for the last 3 years. I re-confirmed this in post 201. How can I brag about the SEC while admitting the B10 has been better...LOL

The only reason I brough up other sports is because you called Sankey a "moron".

For the record, I think it is lame for ANY conference to have a thread dedicated to bashing it. Don't you? Apparently I have more self control than you.

Then in you efforts to troll me you throw an endless barrage of insults in every response. I clearly have not done this to you other than your embarrassment to say what team you root for.

Nope, in post 187 you said:
What a worthless poster.
Stop the whole victim game...geez. You need to get your story straight for a change. Another lie...I am surprised. You are constantly claiming I said something I didn't and constantly pretending to be some victim. Give it up for a change.

You state that you are in my head but my simple responses to you take a minute then you respond with a response to try to rip apart every word and then going back to every post I made. I truly applaud your effort but this only goes to show who is living in whos head.

I have said at least a handful of times....I don't like trolls.

I admit that.

Back to Sankey. He said that 7 teams deserve to be in the playoffs. His argument was that they have 7 teams in the top 14. You do realize that only the top 10 got in this year with 11 and 12 being Conference Champs. His argument is that Texas and Vandy deserved to be in ahead of Miami and Oregon. That is a moronic statement. Who makes moronic statements? Morons.

There you go again. I will actually agree with some of your statement but then you purposely ignore it. I said in post 199: I don't think 7 SEC teams should have made it at all. That is commish speak. I don't think he should have said that.

Your problem is that you are incapable of having a debate or discussion unless the other party completely agrees with you. I am not going to claim the SEC sux like you want me to, so stop trying.

I am sick and tired of asking you questions and having you dodge them. I ask again, if Sankey is a "moron", which commish is better? Is the B10 or ACC commish? Answer the question for a change and stop hiding. If the B10 or another commish is better, show me with facts. You know you can't and I caught you trolling. Sankey is the best commish in the NCAA right when it comes to results. If NOT, prove me wrong. I disagree with what he said but he isn't a moron. If he is a moron, what is the B12 and B10 commisioners? Let me make it easier, which conference has the MOST championships since 2015 in the 8 major sports? If it is the SEC, how can Sankey be a "moron" based off of 1 comment? I might be wrong....just show me using facts and not emotion.

The B12 commish said the B12 was the deepest conference. Call him out. You have this weird thing for the B12 and refuse to call them out for some reason. You are too obsessed with the SEC it seems. You even left out the B12 in your own propaganda post in post 156. You refuse to insult their last 3 years and call their commish a "moron". Answer the question or put me on ignore. Its annoying.

Finally no deal. This is an anti-SEC thread per your statement. BTW your endless rants are not a good look for you.

LOL!

Thanks for falling for the trap. I knew the answer before I asked it. You are addicted to this thread because you are obsessed with the SEC. You can't NOT talk about them. Its the craziest thing I have ever seen on the Hoop. Are other OSU fans addicted to trolling the SEC or is it just you?

You won't find me on the B10 thread because I don't care and its not worth my time. You however have nothing else to do. You can't walk away from this thread because you are on a quest to destroy the SEC...LOL.

Even if it is an official anti-SEC thread, you mean to tell me you have nothing else to do? WOW....

 

[AJBuckeye]

On this thread alone you have accused multiple people of being trolls yet not one person agreed with you.

You made the assumption that most people would agree with you t hat I am a troll and yet not one person has chimed in to defend you.

You keep asking me about Funbags. I have never interacted with Funbags and no nothing about him so I will not accuse him of being a troll especially when I have no clue what his intentions are. Something you are very quick to judge about. Although you are the self appointed troll police that is incapable of self policing.

When I make an argument that the past 3 years the B10 has owned the SEC and provide factual stats it is trolling.
When you make the argument the the SEC the past 10 years has owned all other conference in all sports it is not a troll?? very convenient

You claim that you have more self control then me but then you can't help yourself to critique my every word in nauseating detail.

When someone makes a moronic comment like 7 SEC teams should be in the playoffs I will call them a moron.

Then you troll me again about how great the SEC has been over the last 10 years based on what you call are the 8 major sports. Those sports you identified are sports that you selected so that you can complete your troll.
So from your view point
Womens Volleyball Major Mens Volleyball Not major
Womens Track Major Ice Hockey - Soccer - Lacrosse - Wrestling Not Major
For the record there are only 2 true money makers in sports and that is Football #1 by a long shot followed by Mens Basketball. Based on revenue and conference success these are the only ones that really count.

So looking at the last 3 years Petiti has been far better than Sankey.

 

[blastfromthepast]

On this thread alone you have accused multiple people of being trolls yet not one person agreed with you.

Oh great! You are back. I figured you had seen the light and moved on. I guess 10 days later you finally have a reply...sigh.

Yes, I have admitted I have called you and Funbags trolls because you are. For some reason, that bothers you. The truth can hurt.

You made the assumption that most people would agree with you t hat I am a troll and yet not one person has chimed in to defend you.

I think SEC fans would probably agree with me. That being said, I don't see OSU fans agreeing with you. I am sure they are embarrassed by your responses. I think they would agree that you are more of a conference first fan though.

You keep asking me about Funbags. I have never interacted with Funbags and no nothing about him so I will not accuse him of being a troll especially when I have no clue what his intentions are. Something you are very quick to judge about. Although you are the self appointed troll police that is incapable of self policing.

On page 1 and page 2, he was very active and liked several of your posts before he got perma banned. Given your anger with the SEC, it makes sense that he would support your unhealthy addiction for all things SEC. He personally responded to you in post #21

You don't know what his intentions are? Are you kidding me?

When I make an argument that the past 3 years the B10 has owned the SEC and provide factual stats it is trolling.

When you say it over and over again, yes, its trolling. The intent is to irritate other SEC team and or SEC fans. You know it and I know it. Your ONLY purpose here is to mock the SEC. Why not the B12?

How many posts do I have on the B10 thread? I don't. I do see you are arguing with another SEC fan over there. I am shocked!

When you make the argument the the SEC the past 10 years has owned all other conference in all sports it is not a troll?? very convenient

Where did I say that? I want you to show me where I literally said the SEC owned ALL other conferences in ALL sports. I never said that.

Post 199 even said I was not "chest pumping" as you say and I had to look up those numbers. It was ALL about Sankey and you know it. Stop twisting my words as I am getting sick of it. You are an incredibly dishonest poster because you say things that are NOT true. If you aren't going to be honest, put me on ignore. Its a waste of time to argue with someone who is purposely dishonest

You claim that you have more self control then me but then you can't help yourself to critique my every word in nauseating detail.

Guilty as charged. I have told you SEVERAL times I don't like trolls. What is your point?

When someone makes a moronic comment like 7 SEC teams should be in the playoffs I will call them a moron.

Great....its your opinion and you are factually incorrect. You are an OSU fan right? Why do you care about Sankey? Worry about your own commissioner or AD at OSU.

Then you troll me again about how great the SEC has been over the last 10 years based on what you call are the 8 major sports. Those sports you identified are sports that you selected so that you can complete your troll.

What are you saying here? Calm down.

So from your view point
Womens Volleyball

Yes, post 199.

Mens Volleyball Not major

None of the Power 4 conferences play mens volleyball (B12, B10, SEC or ACC).

Womens Track Major

Yes, post 199.

Ice Hockey

No, the SEC, B12 or ACC have mens hockey.

Soccer

Maybe, like I said in post 199, you can add or subtract a sport. The SEC nor B12 have mens soccer. Kinda hard to be held accountable when you don't play.

Lacrosse

Correct. Neither the B12 or SEC have mens lacrosse. It's mostly a northeastern sport with some western schools.

- Wrestling Not Major

SEC nor ACC have mens wrestling.

For the record there are only 2 true money makers in sports and that is Football #1 by a long shot followed by Mens Basketball. Based on revenue and conference success these are the only ones that really count.

So now you move the goal posts...LOL. Sankey is not a moron and only an ignorant poster, just like you, would say that. I am responding to your pathetic claim. I have proven you are wrong and now you are pivoting. You still haven't proven me wrong with the titles so you had to retreat.

So looking at the last 3 years Petiti has been far better than Sankey.

There you go again with the 3 year crap. I said since 2015 (Sankey's 1st year) and it doesn't fit your narrative, so you shift to your talking points. I don't think Petiti is a moron, but you think Sankey is. I disagree with Petiti on defending Michigan's title as they cheated but I don't think he is a moron because I am educated and know what I am talking about.

Now buzz off...geez

 

[AJBuckeye]

OK I think I am starting to get it. When Bandwagonbo2 refers to people as junior or losers or goes and tells then fan base to go eat some crackers with that whine when defending Alabama. Then Bandwagonbo2 blasts ND schedule telling them that they cry like bitches is apparently OK.

At that point Funbags brings up the Florida State loss. Then he also mentions the pay for play programs utilize by Bama before it was legal and Bandwagonbo2 admitted it you call him out for being a troll.

So SEC fans can throw pretty much any statement and it will not be a troll but if someone responds then you brand them as a troll.

Comparing Women's Track as a major sport on the level of college football or men's basketball simply moronic. Basketball and Football fund the entire sports program at money colleges and the rest are simply leaches. However if those coveted track titles make you feel better about the SEC and Sankey by all means go for it although it is not a good look for you.

Considering none of your SEC buddies have back you likely because they are embarrassed about your obsession with me.

Not only is Sankey a moron. So are you.

Now buzz off ...troll.

 

[blastfromthepast]

OK I think I am starting to get it. When Bandwagonbo2 refers to people as junior or losers or goes and tells then fan base to go eat some crackers with that whine when defending Alabama. Then Bandwagonbo2 blasts ND schedule telling them that they cry like bitches is apparently OK.

Are you really going to argue with me about Bandwagon and Funbags?

If you have issues with Bandwagon, take it up with him or a mod. I don't care.

What I do know is that Bandwagon didn't get along with Funbags, just like most of us did not. Funbags was thread banned a few times and had posts removed. He openly cursed out posters, used highly offensive insults, and made fun of special needs children. The mods obviously had enough and he is gone. He was buddies with a few ND posters but most of us realized he was unwell and are glad he is gone.

For the record, I blasted ND as well as I thought the whole Pop Tarts Bowl fiasco was absurd. I think most fans were disgusted.

If you have to pick between Bandwagon or Funbags, any decent and rational person would side with Bandwagon.

At that point Funbags brings up the Florida State loss. Then he also mentions the pay for play programs utilize by Bama before it was legal and Bandwagonbo2 admitted it you call him out for being a troll.

I don't care what Bandwagon said in his argument with Funbags. Do you understand what banned means? Do you understand he mocked the Special Olympics multiple times and was warned to stop. If that doesn't bother you, you have serious issues.

He fought the mods, he fought SEC fans, and he fought anyone who disagreed with him. Everyone is glad he is gone.

So SEC fans can throw pretty much any statement and it will not be a troll but if someone responds then you brand them as a troll.

Is it an unprovoked attack or a rebuttal? I prefer these conference threads be shut down as no good is coming from it obviously.

Comparing Women's Track as a major sport on the level of college football or men's basketball simply moronic.

I didn't say it did I. It's a major women's sport. Does that bother you somehow? Are you suggesting women's sports don't matter?

Basketball and Football fund the entire sports program at money colleges and the rest are simply leaches.

What is your point? If that is really the case, lets disband the other worthless sports.

However if those coveted track titles make you feel better about the SEC and Sankey by all means go for it although it is not a good look for you.

I was simply stating a fact about Sankey's success. This whole thread has been me embarrassing you and you know it. You can't show me a better commish over the last 10 years using results. Stop the whole 3 years crap, its annoying.

Considering none of your SEC buddies have back you likely because they are embarrassed about your obsession with me.

What would you have them say? I have handled you with relative ease and even caught you in a few lies. Clearly, I have no need of assistance.

The funny part is I have said over a dozen times that I want the conferences to be discontinued. Ask Belcherboy or DGTGold. I have said I want pro-style divisions installed. Why would an SEC conference first fan troll want to see the SEC disbanded? Get back to me on that one.

Not only is Sankey a moron. So are you.

Well now its personal.....ouch.

Let's play the "moron" game.

Big 12 (Yormark); He said in July 2025 that the Big 12 will be the "deepest football conference in America,". He further said: "No league offers the competitive balance that we do,".
He also publicly attacked the ND AD Pete Bevacqua for his "egregious" and "out of bounds" reaction to the 2025 College Football Playoff field. Why would a B12 commissioner publicly attack another team NOT in his conference?

Is he a moron?

PAC 12 (Gould). She is adding new teams to replace UCLA, USC, Washington, and Oregon. On July 1, 2026, new member additions will include Boise State, Colorado State, Fresno State, San Diego State, and Gonzaga) and a partnership with CBS Sports.

So her goal to rebuild a once proud conference is to add Gonzaga and Fresno State?

Is she a moron?

B10 (Pettiti). He sent a letter to the NCAA in summer 2025 advocating against further penalties for Michigan football regarding the sign-stealing scandal, arguing the conference's 2023 suspension of Harbaugh was sufficient. The letter aimed to prevent additional sanctions like postseason bans or vacated wins, prioritizing conference stability.

So in other words, Stallions and the coaches cheated but shouldn't be punished really. Weiss is still under investigation by the FBI and Moore is currently in jail. Harbaugh did not cooperate and Stallions threw his phone in a lake. It's the biggest scandal in several years and Pettiti wants it to go away pretty much so Michigan can keep the title it seems.

Surely you disagree as an OSU fan. Is he a moron?

ACC (Phillips). Openly argued with a team in his conference (Notre Dame) and feuded with the ND AD in the press. He openly advocated for Miami over ND for the playoffs. If this was all a conspiracy to keep out ND and get Bama in, then Phillips is a conspirator correct?

Is he a moron?

To recap, is Sankey the only moron here or are the other commissioners who said more absurd things or have failed to do their jobs such as disregarding cheating morons as well?

Get your thoughts together and get back with me.

Now buzz off ...troll.

LOL! I already said that. Get some of your own material.

 

[AJBuckeye]

Well you are the one who brought up funbags over and over again. I just looked at the interaction on this thread. It was bandwagon who threw at the unprovoked attacks with with referring to others as junior or losers or goes and tells then fan base to go eat some crackers with that whine when defending Alabama. At that point funbags rebutted.
Being the self appointed troll police you would think that you would be able to recognize the troll on this one. Unfortunatly you have your SEC blinders on.

BTW I have no issues with either one of them unlike you.



Regarding college major sports here is what AI says:
football and men's basketball are unequivocally considered the "major" sports, as they generate the vast majority of revenue and viewer interest.
"major" sports are defined by their capacity to generate revenue and university funding.

Seems pretty clear to me what the major sports are. Next in line in terms of generating revenue and interest are womens basketball, hockey, baseball, and softball.

Not once I have I said to ban all womens sports. I just have no interest to watch them.



Regarding the personal attacks you have attempted to belittle me over and over again with personal attacks. Clearly it is your style when continually pat your self on the back claiming how you handle me with relative ease. Problem is only you believe that.



Now to the other AD's
B12 Claiming they had they deepest conference last season. Here is the actual OOC record for P4 opponents
B12 12 - 8
B10 11 - 9
SEC 12 - 12
ACC 11 - 17
Is he a moron for making this claim? No but you on the otherhand???

P12 for adding additional teams to sustain the conference.
Is she a moron? No she is doing everything in her power to do her job and sustain the conference. But you on the otherhand???

B10 Sending a letter on behalf of scum.
Surely you disagree as an OSU fan. Is he a moron? No he is doing what he feels he needs to do to protect one of his members. That being said I strongly disagree with it but my focus is tOSU and his is the B10

ACC For lobbying against ND. You do understand that ND is not in the ACC for football. The ESecPN Committee forced the hand when they decided to jump Alabama ahead of ND after Bama barely slipped by a team with a losing record on the same weekend ND waxed a team. Since those 2 teams were next to each other in the rankings that argument makes all of the sense. And by the way it did work but also keep in mind the ACC is owned by the ESecPN network.
Is he a moron? No but you on the otherhand???

Sankey on the other hand had teams in the final rankings at 3,6,7,8,9,13,14. With Spots 11, 12 going to autbids that leaves only the top 10 spots available for the playoffs. He clearly is no math whiz as this would have left 11-1 Oregon on the outside and promote Texas and Vandy ahead of 4 teams in the final rankings.
Is this a moronic statement? Absolutely it is.

How do you like them apples?....troll

 

[blastfromthepast]

Well you are the one who brought up funbags over and over again. I just looked at the interaction on this thread. It was bandwagon who threw at the unprovoked attacks with with referring to others as junior or losers or goes and tells then fan base to go eat some crackers with that whine when defending Alabama. At that point funbags rebutted.

Like I said, they haven't gotten a long for quite some time. I suggest ask somebody...anybody about Funbags. There is a reason he was banned from this site entirely. To think they just bumped into each other for the first time here is just being naive.

Being the self appointed troll police you would think that you would be able to recognize the troll on this one. Unfortunatly you have your SEC blinders on.

Sure, it's the person who is banned indefinitely. Again, you are trying to grasp something that you don't know the history of and you are trying to making a assumption without having the full picture.

BTW I have no issues with either one of them unlike you.

Of course I have issues with Funbags. He made fun of special needs children and got a temporary ban for some pretty vile stuff. Of course I don't like him and I am shocked that type of behavior is acceptable to you.

Regarding college major sports here is what AI says:
football and men's basketball are unequivocally considered the "major" sports, as they generate the vast majority of revenue and viewer interest.
"major" sports are defined by their capacity to generate revenue and university funding.

Seems pretty clear to me what the major sports are. Next in line in terms of generating revenue and interest are womens basketball, hockey, baseball, and softball.

Not once I have I said to ban all womens sports. I just have no interest to watch them.

Great! So what does that have to do with the titles Sankey is responsible for as commissioner since 2015?

Suppose Sankey is behind Pettiti, when that does mean that Phillips, Gould, and Yormak are morons and should be fired ASAP?

I am not arguing about revenue generating sports, I am arguing with you on your mischaracterization of Sankey.

Regarding the personal attacks you have attempted to belittle me over and over again with personal attacks. Clearly it is your style when continually pat your self on the back claiming how you handle me with relative ease. Problem is only you believe that.

You take umbrage with the fact I called you a troll. Yet 70% of your posts are attacking the SEC.

Let me ask you this, if the B12 and ACC are worse than the SEC, where are your attacks on them?

Now to the other AD's
B12 Claiming they had they deepest conference last season. Here is the actual OOC record for P4 opponents
B12 12 - 8
B10 11 - 9
SEC 12 - 12
ACC 11 - 17
Is he a moron for making this claim? No but you on the otherhand???

You failed to address Yormark attacking ND and the ND AD. You also failed to address the fact that he said the B12 was the deepest conference in America. Are you suggesting that the B12 is deeper than the SEC or B10? You and I know it isn't.

You know I am right here and that Yormark shoots off his mouth. There is no reason for the B12 commish to reprimand ND to the press like that.

P12 for adding additional teams to sustain the conference.
Is she a moron? No she is doing everything in her power to do her job and sustain the conference. But you on the otherhand???

So Sankey is a moron for trying to promote his conference and you are fine with Gould rebuilding the PAC12 with Fresno St and Colorado St.

B10 Sending a letter on behalf of scum.
Surely you disagree as an OSU fan. Is he a moron? No he is doing what he feels he needs to do to protect one of his members. That being said I strongly disagree with it but my focus is tOSU and his is the B10

So he is subsidizing cheating at Michigan to claim a national title. So he is ignoring a major scandal that has the FBI involved now and he wants to leave it alone?

You mean to tell me that Sankey saying 7 SEC teams should be in the playoff is more egregious than Pettiti wanting the NCAA to go light on Michigan? WOW!!!

You just said Pettiti is focused on his conference. Sankey is ALSO focused on his conference.

Are you actually suggesting that telling the media 7 conference teams belonging in the playoff is MORE egregious than trying to minimize and forget about a major college football scandal?

ACC For lobbying against ND. You do understand that ND is not in the ACC for football.

Correct, but the ACC does schedule 5 teams for ND each and every year.

The ESecPN Committee forced the hand when they decided to jump Alabama ahead of ND after Bama barely slipped by a team with a losing record on the same weekend ND waxed a team. Since those 2 teams were next to each other in the rankings that argument makes all of the sense. And by the way it did work but also keep in mind the ACC is owned by the ESecPN network.
Is he a moron? No but you on the otherhand???

So it was Phillips with the candlestick in the billiards room correct? If Phillips is being accused by ND of putting in Miami over ND. Why didn't ND come after Sankey? Instead, they went after Phillips publicly. Who is the villan here: Phillips or Sankey?

Sankey on the other hand had teams in the final rankings at 3,6,7,8,9,13,14. With Spots 11, 12 going to autbids that leaves only the top 10 spots available for the playoffs. He clearly is no math whiz as this would have left 11-1 Oregon on the outside and promote Texas and Vandy ahead of 4 teams in the final rankings.
Is this a moronic statement? Absolutely it is.

Was it a moronic statement or is Sankey a moron?

To be clear, according to you:

Sankey = moron
Pettiti, Phillips, Yormark, Gould = not morons

Is this what you are saying?

How do you like them apples?....troll

Nice Good Will Hunting quote, but it doesnt make sense here. You are not making a sound argument at all.

 

[AJBuckeye]

So when I spell it out for you, your approach is ignore the facts and go to some non-sensical clue reference. So let me try again.

Sankey runs the SEC
The SEC and ESPN have tied heavily together with their TV deal.
Hence ESecPN is a reference to that partnership.

Are you still following????

ESecPN selection committee is heavily influenced but the ESecPN pundits and their talking points.

Examples from this year.
1) BAMA barely beats Auburn with a losing record then jumps ND who destroyed Cal
2) ND and Miami both sit idle. Somehow the committee jumps Miami ahead of ND
Keep in mind the ACC is also part of the ESecPN network. During the evaluation the committee decides to go back and watch a week one game between ND and Miami prior to making their decision. Also the ESecPN network replays the game continuously on the ESecPN ACC network. Then keep in mind they totally ignore week one game where Bama was completely outclassed by a not very good FSU team.
You still following this ???
3) Then after Championship week Bama gets a complete smack down by UGA. Somehow BAMA stays put in the rankings. It was the first and only time in over 40 Championship games that the loser did not drop at least 1 spot.

Now back to Sankey
I did not call anyone a villian as that is your term. I just claimed he made a moronic statement statement when he said 7 SEC teams should be in the playoffs.
I am sure you agree this is a moronic statement? Right?

The problem with moronic statements like these is that the ESecPN network will defend them. Then they will have their pundits push narratives such as these and there any many people that will swallow it hook line a sinker.

 

[blastfromthepast]

So when I spell it out for you, your approach is ignore the facts and go to some non-sensical clue reference. So let me try again.

What facts am I ignoring?

I have stated the following:

Funbags was a troll
You hate the SEC and are a troll. I don't even think you know that you are doing it to be honest. You state the same things over and over again and want the SEC to collapse or something.
Sankey is NOT a moron

I have been very clear in my arguments.

Sankey runs the SEC
The SEC and ESPN have tied heavily together with their TV deal.
Hence ESecPN is a reference to that partnership.

Are you still following????

ESecPN selection committee is heavily influenced but the ESecPN pundits and their talking points.

Examples from this year.
1) BAMA barely beats Auburn with a losing record then jumps ND who destroyed Cal
2) ND and Miami both sit idle. Somehow the committee jumps Miami ahead of ND
Keep in mind the ACC is also part of the ESecPN network. During the evaluation the committee decides to go back and watch a week one game between ND and Miami prior to making their decision. Also the ESecPN network replays the game continuously on the ESecPN ACC network. Then keep in mind they totally ignore week one game where Bama was completely outclassed by a not very good FSU team.
You still following this ???
3) Then after Championship week Bama gets a complete smack down by UGA. Somehow BAMA stays put in the rankings. It was the first and only time in over 40 Championship games that the loser did not drop at least 1 spot.

You are all over the place. I said BYU should have gotten in over Bama at least a handful of times.

Now back to Sankey
I did not call anyone a villian as that is your term. I just claimed he made a moronic statement statement when he said 7 SEC teams should be in the playoffs.

Not true, you have called Sankey a moron a few times. Did he make a moronic statement or is he a moron? Apparently I am a moron according to you as well. According to your own words:

Post 202: Who makes moronic statements? Morons.

Post 204: When someone makes a moronic comment like 7 SEC teams should be in the playoffs I will call them a moron.

Post 206: Not only is Sankey a moron. So are you.

You said in post 208: No he is doing what he feels he needs to do to protect one of his members. That being said I strongly disagree with it but my focus is tOSU and his is the B10.

Using your logic, why can't Sankey promote his conference (Vandy and Texas), but Pettit can? I disagree with replacing JMU and Tulane and Vandy/Texas. But he is doing his best to promote his conference and according to you in post 208:

Is she a moron? No she is doing everything in her power to do her job and sustain the conference.

So basically, Pettit, Yormark and Gould can promote their conference and say whatever they want but Sankey is the moron if he does the same thing. If Sankey protected LSU or Georgia after a major cheating scandal, I am sure you would lose it.

I am sure you agree this is a moronic statement? Right?

I said in post 199: I don't think 7 SEC teams should have made it at all. That is commish speak. I don't think he should have said that.

I still believe what Yormark and Pettit did/said was worse than Sankey's off the cuff comment when he promoted his conference.

I don't think these commissioners are "morons" but you have it out for the SEC and like to promote the B10 and protect the B12, Anyone can see that.

You have a thing for the B12 and I can't figure out why. You have protected Yormark in a few posts. I need you to address the fact that the B12 is 1-8 in playoff games since 2014. That is awful but you ONLY focus on the SEC and the past 3 years. At least be fair in your judgements. You list SEC statistics over and over again but refuse to mention the B12 for some odd reason. If the SEC sux, surely the B12 is on par with HS football right?

The problem with moronic statements like these is that the ESecPN network will defend them. Then they will have their pundits push narratives such as these and there any many people that will swallow it hook line a sinker.

 

[AJBuckeye]

Wow you are not only going after every word from every post I make. You are now regurgitating many of my previous posts in the process.

Please explain to me how this logic is all over the place. I get it does not fit your narrative but it is some pretty sound logic.
Examples from this year.
1) BAMA barely beats Auburn with a losing record then jumps ND who destroyed Cal
2) ND and Miami both sit idle. Somehow the committee jumps Miami ahead of ND
Keep in mind the ACC is also part of the ESecPN network. During the evaluation the committee decides to go back and watch a week one game between ND and Miami prior to making their decision. Also the ESecPN network replays the game continuously on the ESecPN ACC network. Then keep in mind they totally ignore week one game where Bama was completely outclassed by a not very good FSU team.
You still following this ???
3) Then after Championship week Bama gets a complete smack down by UGA. Somehow BAMA stays put in the rankings. It was the first and only time in over 40 Championship games that the loser did not drop at least 1 spot.


Here is why Sankey statement was moronic.
He states that 7 teams are ranked in the top 14. (Texas, Vandy 13,14)
He knows only at large teams in the top 10 should get in.
His statement essentially says that the SEC deserves 6 of the 7 at large spots and Oregon was unworthy.

These statements and view points are then embedded into the ESecPN talking points as fact.
When the committee takes the bate and gives the SEC what they want they then pat themselves on the back on what a great job the committee did.
People with SEC blinders are not able to see this or comprehend it.

Keep in mind if the computer polls which I referenced in this thread were used. Neither Oklahoma or Alabama would have made. That would have been a good thing for the SEC looking back as Indiana completely throttled the winner of the that game.

 

[blastfromthepast]

Wow you are not only going after every word from every post I make. You are now regurgitating many of my previous posts in the process.

Please explain to me how this logic is all over the place. I get it does not fit your narrative but it is some pretty sound logic.
Examples from this year.
1) BAMA barely beats Auburn with a losing record then jumps ND who destroyed Cal
2) ND and Miami both sit idle. Somehow the committee jumps Miami ahead of ND
Keep in mind the ACC is also part of the ESecPN network. During the evaluation the committee decides to go back and watch a week one game between ND and Miami prior to making their decision. Also the ESecPN network replays the game continuously on the ESecPN ACC network. Then keep in mind they totally ignore week one game where Bama was completely outclassed by a not very good FSU team.
You still following this ???
3) Then after Championship week Bama gets a complete smack down by UGA. Somehow BAMA stays put in the rankings. It was the first and only time in over 40 Championship games that the loser did not drop at least 1 spot.

I said almost 10 times now that Bama should not have made it. Do you understand that? What else do you want me to say other than "the SEC sux"?

I am not a conspiracy theorist, and I don't believe the committee is corrupt. There are 3 B10 reps and 3 SEC reps. Why would B10 reps freely support a vast SEC conspiracy? You told me the SEC cheated previously and were gifted championships. You have theories in your head because you hate the SEC. We have more dirt on Michigan but you ignore that.

Here is why Sankey statement was moronic.

I have said 4 times now that I disagree with Sankey's statement. Do you understand that? What else do you want me to say.

That does not make him a moron as you say though. You are still defending the other commissioners and not being fair in your judgements.

He states that 7 teams are ranked in the top 14. (Texas, Vandy 13,14)
He knows only at large teams in the top 10 should get in.
His statement essentially says that the SEC deserves 6 of the 7 at large spots and Oregon was unworthy.

For the 5th time, I disagree with what he said. You honestly agree with Yormark but condemn Sankey.

However, that doesn't mean the other commissioners are above and beyond Sankey and you know it.

Sankey is NOT a moron
The SEC doesn't sux

Or are you going to push that narrative and claim you are still an OSU fan instead of a B10 conference first fan?

These statements and view points are then embedded into the ESecPN talking points as fact.
When the committee takes the bate and gives the SEC what they want they then pat themselves on the back on what a great job the committee did.
People with SEC blinders are not able to see this or comprehend it.

Now you have gone off the rails. Many SEC and non-SEC fans don't think Bama should have made it. Hence the reason why we need to eliminate conferences all together. I have said that 10 times.

Keep in mind if the computer polls which I referenced in this thread were used. Neither Oklahoma or Alabama would have made. That would have been a good thing for the SEC looking back as Indiana completely throttled the winner of the that game.

Again, your obsession with the SEC is obvious and you keep saying this over and over again.

 

[occupant]

 

[ericd7633]

Who else is coming?

 

[navamind]

Who else is coming?

 

[trojanfight]

 

[ThomasTomasz]

expanded playoffs good for those who want better football games and for Alabama not to schedule three matchups against Southern Alabama, The Citadel and Valdosta State every year.

Not a surprise that they cancelled Oklahoma State. I like Eric Morris, but he’s got his work cut out for him there.

 

[occupant]

Who else is coming?

I have no clue.

I’ve noticed that there are several who’ve maintained dual postership…I have nothing against this place or the other place. I do good to keep up with one board and even then I’m not really keeping up.

Just a timefiller.

TBH the other place wasn’t greater or worse in entertainment value. I’ve learned that idiocy and compulsive behaviors are pretty fVcking widespread in our society any more. It’s both very entertaining and very sad. *cue Donnie Darko music*