- Thread starter
- #1
Even without the no trade, that goofy vesting option makes him virtually untradeable anyway. Look at Detroit for example: Iglesias is out for a few months, but even if they did want Rollins to play for them this year and even if Rollins wanted to play for Detroit this year it still wouldn't work. If Rollins actually played well he would end up getting enough At Bats for that option to kick in and then next year when Iglesias came back they'd be stuck with an 11 million dollar reserve.
Detroit really needs a short stop. Again. Like last year. So, fingers crossed on the clownish front office making it happen.
Detroit is a contender and guaranteed playing time for Rollins. Might be good enough to wave the clause.