- Thread starter
- #1
idseer
Well-Known Member
frankly i don't care if i ever see either of those 2 losers again.
jones SHOULD have been traded. he's one of the more worthless players for the money the sox have ever had.
when i think of rodon i get angry about the whole free agency bullshit all over. you pick a guy and you have him locked up for what .. 6 years? problem is he actually costs more than he's worth ... for six years! then he walks and becomes a better player for someone else. or not. point is, there should be a provision to not count the time a player is with a team if over half his career he's being paid while being unable to play. both these losers have actually COST the team money while producing almost nothing. how is this a fair system?
jones SHOULD have been traded. he's one of the more worthless players for the money the sox have ever had.
when i think of rodon i get angry about the whole free agency bullshit all over. you pick a guy and you have him locked up for what .. 6 years? problem is he actually costs more than he's worth ... for six years! then he walks and becomes a better player for someone else. or not. point is, there should be a provision to not count the time a player is with a team if over half his career he's being paid while being unable to play. both these losers have actually COST the team money while producing almost nothing. how is this a fair system?