- Thread starter
- #1
seahawksfan234
Radical Moderate
This just blows me away.
I think that there is no doubt that Richard Sherman is the best CB in the NFL. Even if he didn't have the 8 interceptions he would still be the best because of how outstanding his coverage skills are.
But the best CB in the NFL being ranked #50? Doesn't make sense to me.
How the hell does Cam Newton get ranked higher? I'd take Russell Wilson or Colin Kaepernick over Cam Newton any day.
Darrell Revis was ranked #5 in 2012. IMO Richard Sherman's coverage in 2012 was as good, if not better than Revis's in 2011, and that's not even taking into account the fact that Sherman had twice as many INTs as Revis did that year.
Revis was also ranked #8 in the 2011 list. Seriously I don't understand how Revis gets so much love when Sherman clearly had a better season.
There is no doubt Sherman should have been in the top 10.
I think that there is no doubt that Richard Sherman is the best CB in the NFL. Even if he didn't have the 8 interceptions he would still be the best because of how outstanding his coverage skills are.
But the best CB in the NFL being ranked #50? Doesn't make sense to me.
How the hell does Cam Newton get ranked higher? I'd take Russell Wilson or Colin Kaepernick over Cam Newton any day.
Darrell Revis was ranked #5 in 2012. IMO Richard Sherman's coverage in 2012 was as good, if not better than Revis's in 2011, and that's not even taking into account the fact that Sherman had twice as many INTs as Revis did that year.
Revis was also ranked #8 in the 2011 list. Seriously I don't understand how Revis gets so much love when Sherman clearly had a better season.
There is no doubt Sherman should have been in the top 10.