- Thread starter
- #1
nj_cup
Well-Known Member
- 5,373
- 115
- 63
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2010
- Hoopla Cash
- $ 1,000.00
anyone pay any attention to this? some good ideas floating around.
love the more shallow nets i think if you let the netting lay more loose picks will just get smothered by it and not just bounce out. yeah it may only open up a few ft of ice but still it adds up.
i'm also in favor of increasing the size of the blueline a bit. also little amount but adds up.
hate the full 2min powerplay idea. the no touch icing isnt a big deal to me either way.
3on3 ot is BEYOND STUPID did anyone watch the video they showed? after playing 65mins of hockey you think players are going to last more then 25 seconds going coast to coast? you really want a game to end because one guy is gassed?
for the record i'm a big fan of the shootout. i just think it should go 60mins game THEN shootout. fixes 2 problems gets rid of the stale 4on4 overtime (which isnt real hockey anyway since hte game is played 5on5) and it also gets rid of the INSANELY stupid OTL.
love the more shallow nets i think if you let the netting lay more loose picks will just get smothered by it and not just bounce out. yeah it may only open up a few ft of ice but still it adds up.
i'm also in favor of increasing the size of the blueline a bit. also little amount but adds up.
hate the full 2min powerplay idea. the no touch icing isnt a big deal to me either way.
3on3 ot is BEYOND STUPID did anyone watch the video they showed? after playing 65mins of hockey you think players are going to last more then 25 seconds going coast to coast? you really want a game to end because one guy is gassed?
for the record i'm a big fan of the shootout. i just think it should go 60mins game THEN shootout. fixes 2 problems gets rid of the stale 4on4 overtime (which isnt real hockey anyway since hte game is played 5on5) and it also gets rid of the INSANELY stupid OTL.