Raid
Active Member
And Montana #2.
Another point about context. An example like the 2003 divisional round. Manning had a home game in a dome vs a bottomfeeder defense. Brady had a home game outside vs a good D.
Controlled climate vs the 2nd or 3rd coldest game in history. Is it realistic to suggest Manning had a vastly superior game? He damn sure did stats wise but context matters.
Brady would have lit up the bottom feeder D in a dome. Would Manning had even won his game if it was played in Foxboro that night against the Titans? Maybe but probably not based on his history.
Examples like that are why just stating Manning has better stats in the postseason doesn't tell the whole story.
Another point about context. An example like the 2003 divisional round. Manning had a home game in a dome vs a bottomfeeder defense. Brady had a home game outside vs a good D.
Controlled climate vs the 2nd or 3rd coldest game in history. Is it realistic to suggest Manning had a vastly superior game? He damn sure did stats wise but context matters.
Brady would have lit up the bottom feeder D in a dome. Would Manning had even won his game if it was played in Foxboro that night against the Titans? Maybe but probably not based on his history.
Examples like that are why just stating Manning has better stats in the postseason doesn't tell the whole story.
And things like poor coaching, kickers missing GW or GT field goals, and absurdly bad/good luck (tuck rule, pick vs chargers that they then fumbled vs Gijon not knowing snap count, onside kick, garcon wide open drop, refs ignoring 5 yd contact rule) are why win-loss record doesn't tell the whole story
And things like poor coaching, kickers missing GW or GT field goals, and absurdly bad/good luck (tuck rule, pick vs chargers that they then fumbled vs Gijon not knowing snap count, onside kick, garcon wide open drop, refs ignoring 5 yd contact rule) are why win-loss record doesn't tell the whole story
Agree totally, it's why you have to watch the games. If everyone had then there would be nobody saying Manning has outperformed Brady in playoffs. Brady has battled in much tougher elements and overall been more clutch. Let's be honest, both guys have had breaks go for them and against them. The one break that effected both of them was in 2006 AFCCG when Reche Caldwell couldn't catch 2 balls when wide open and then the phantom PI call in end zone that gave Colts 1st and goal on the 1. League sent letter of apology to Pats for that call - these breaks went Mannings way and he got his 1 ring because of it.
And Montana #2.
Manning definitely belongs in the GOAT category. He delivers, Brady not so much, be honest.
He delivers? When? His one title year he had 3 Td's and 7 ints (3 for pick-6) in the postseason.
He probably is the regular season GOAT...but overall. Montana has it ALL over him. Neither Manning or Brady should be in the discussion any more.
If you think Peyton Manning does not deliver you have not been watching much football lately. Brady has taken a great dip VS his greatest competitor of the age.
If you think Peyton Manning does not deliver you have not been watching much football lately. Brady has taken a great dip VS his greatest competitor of the age.
Wow that's a weird picture of Peyton Manning masturbating.
Peyton: 1-2 in SB's w/o the benefit of Spy Gate
Brady: 3-0 during Spy Gate & 0-2 AFTER that
Say what ya want but the fact that Brady was 3-0 while cheating & 0-2 once the Pats got caught really should be mentioned. Of course I'll be labeled as a Hater for simply pointing out the truth though. Or did I just make this stuff up?