TexasMan
mfw reading SportsHoopla
So if this is all about how teams just win with a QB, where's the crusade to get Vince Young back in the NFL?
While you're trying to put words in my mouth, what I said was it was a team effort. I didn't suggest that he didn't have anything to do with what Denver did or that they could have done what they did without him. You guys might want to sweep under the rug the fact that he played poorly most of the time but I'll keep pulling that rug back. He was awful! Awful game in and game out for most of the game and the defense and running game would keep it close. So we're not going to sit here and act like the team just sucked and he was this savior. What kind of savior sucks for 55 minutes? Tebow was a cog, a link in the chain, that played well and had a lot of luck at the end of games. Plain and simple, if he were good, he would have a job.
So if this is all about how teams just win with a QB, where's the crusade to get Vince Young back in the NFL?
And this combined with your blind defense of Tebow is why you're so hard to take seriously.
Two players with more than 50 attempts had a completion percentage over 65% before 1972. 3 did it in the 70s, one twice. In the 80s 13 did it, in the 90s, 21, and between 2000-2010 69 did it. Era is irrelevant, though.
Of course its easier to complete passes now. Passes now are thrown 2 yards. Its tougher to complete long downfield passes now because of the defensive schemes. Nobody is saying Tebow is a cookie cutter QB but when you totally disregard the fact the guy WINS EVERYWHERE HE HAS EVER PLAYED then you look like a jackass. If you dont like winning then thats cool, Ill take it though.
To sum up Tebow played NO PART AT ALL in a team going from 5-16 in their previous 21 games to winning the division and a playoff game when he became starter ( even though he was the only change made), he has no strentghs as a QB (which of course means that ANYONE can win a NFL divsion and an NFL playoff game, ANYONE) and despite leading the league in yards per completion he throws a terrible deep ball. LOL. I dont even like Tebow, not at all, its just mindblowing as a non-biased outside guy to see the hate and vitriol for this guy. Carry on yall.
To sum up Tebow played NO PART AT ALL in a team going from 5-16 in their previous 21 games to winning the division and a playoff game when he became starter ( even though he was the only change made), he has no strentghs as a QB (which of course means that ANYONE can win a NFL divsion and an NFL playoff game, ANYONE) and despite leading the league in yards per completion he throws a terrible deep ball. LOL. I dont even like Tebow, not at all, its just mindblowing as a non-biased outside guy to see the hate and vitriol for this guy. Carry on yall.
No need to put words in your mouth. "He sucked, but they still won." Because that's how the NFL works. All the teams with the worst QBs always make the playoffs, right?
I have already stated that I get that he's not the most polished QB out there, but his intangibles are off the charts. There's no reason from a physical standpoint that he should have success as an NFL QB, but he does. It's the maturity, it's the leadership, it's the will that makes Tim Tebow a good QB. If he ever gets it right physically (throwing motion, footwork, reading defenses), he'll be a great QB.
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "There's no reason from a physical standpoint that he should have success as an NFL QB, but he does." Is that a typo were you meant that he has the physical attributes so he should succeed or are you trying to sell that he has had some success? I can only assume you mean he doesn't have the physical attributes and he's successful anyway which I have to call bullshit on. I don't care how many games the team won or if they won a playoff game, he played awfully and if he played awfully then you can't say he was successful IMO. If a CB gets beat like a drum all day but makes one great play and the team wins was he successful? If a DE is in the QBs face all day, sacking him, hurrying him, just generally dirtying up his uni but the tackle keeps the QB clean on the last drive was he successful? anyone else who can only give a team 5 good minutes per game would have been out of the league already but we want to treat Tebow differently.
I'm not sure exactly what you mean by "There's no reason from a physical standpoint that he should have success as an NFL QB, but he does."
But half those intangibles were blind hype and novelty. The novelty is gone and the hype will follow when he gets shut down for a year or two.
To quote The Princess Bride, "I do not think it means what you think it means."
Intangibles are abilities that one has that cannot be quantified. Hype is not an ability one has. Novelty is not an ability one can possess. Leadership, will, drive, work ethic, etc. are abilities that cannot be quantified, but are still positive attributes of one's skill set. Of which Tim Tebow has. He has "it" as far as intangibles go, and the abilities that are lacking like throwing motion and footwork are things that can be coached.
I don't think he does. I think that's what made the difference. He played a role similar to ray Lewis in the playoffs. He was a deciding factor, but based in things unrelated to any actual contribution himself, and it's not something to be sustained.
Ray Lewis this year. In the past he contributed as one of the best ever. I am referring to what he did this year, which, from a pure linebacker standpoint, was embarrassing.