- Thread starter
- #1
PhilSimms11
Well-Known Member
Please report to the Minnesota Vikings.
That could also happen.Browns race to the Podium 1st & beat out the Vikes to the pick!
Browns race to the Podium 1st & beat out the Vikes to the pick!
Excellent point, & what way to ruin my witty jokeLuckily he’s a free agent
He ain’t choosing the browns if someone else calls
& its his groin. That may be a long term injuryAdd the Rams to the list with Zuerlein hurt again.
Barely a heartbreak.Vikings still struggle finding kickers. Another heart break for the fans of Minny.
I'm pretty sure the Vikes were not content with a tie.Barely a heartbreak.
They were content with a tie. A win would’ve been icing on the cake.
You didn’t watch the game. That is clearly apparent. Not one Viking fan has come on here and said they outplayed the Packers.I'm pretty sure the Vikes were not content with a tie.
Maybe you were saying GB was content with a tie considering they got outplayed all day and if not for that missed chip shot and Chicago gifting them a win last week, GB would tied with Detroit. The difference Detroit has a healthy no diva QB.
I'm pretty sure the Vikes were not content with a tie.
Maybe you were saying GB was content with a tie considering they got outplayed all day and if not for that missed chip shot and Chicago gifting them a win last week, GB would tied with Detroit. The difference Detroit has a healthy no diva QB.
You didn’t watch the game. That is clearly apparent. Not one Viking fan has come on here and said they outplayed the Packers.
Here you are defying the consensus in an attempt to stir shit up.
You didn’t watch the game. That is clearly apparent. Not one Viking fan has come on here and said they outplayed the Packers.
Here you are defying the consensus in an attempt to stir shit up.
He was more worried about Brady being a diva yelling at the players on the sidelines as the Jags out played his team
Barely a heartbreak.
They were content with a tie. A win would’ve been icing on the cake.
I wouldn't say the Vikings outplayed the Packers all game by any means. But they did ultimately give the game away to them due to their own stupidity courtesy of Daniel "Walsh" Calrson, Treadwell aka slow Troy Wialliamson, and Zimmer's idiotic decision to play for a FG to end the game when the GB D was clearly toast.
Let's be honest, as good as Rogers is, you were gifted your first win by Chicago when they had no business letting it slip, and were lucky to escape with a tie against the Vikings. I'll admit we were lucky to tie too after all the stupid MN blunders, but you're delusional if you can't acknowledge how eaily the Pack could have been sitting at p-2 right now.
When your second bullet point is kick return yards that usually means you didn't actually watch it, but are going by the box score and that you should give up on the argument...Cousins 425 yards, 4 TDs, 2 sacks, 1 Int
Rodgers 281 yards, 1 TD, 4 sacks, 1 Fumble
Viking kick returns 74 yards, punt returns 13 yards
Pack kick returns 8 yards, punt returns 0
Vikings 130+ more yards
Vikings 22 4th quarter points
Penalties and rushing were close enough one team had 7 the other 8. GB 30 more yards on the ground. The only reason it looked different was GB owned the TOP.
IMO Vikes outplayed them to me? I have no dog in the fight and have said on here multiple times how much I enjoyed my time in GB and watching them play. But we both know Minny should've won that game. Considering they were on the road a tie is closer to a win then it was for GB. Got to protect the house.
Sorry nothing I can do about Rodgers being a diva and getting outplayed by who? Oh yeah Kirk Cousins