OT: big10 football fans?

[trev0914]

next year when Nebraska joins the big10 and they split the conference into two divisions they decided rather than using north and south or east and west as names, theyre going to go with "legends" and "leaders"... thoughts?

 

[dash]

I don't like "Legends" and Leaders" - How about the Paterno and Schembechler divisions?

/This coming from a Canadian who knows very little about NCAA football, but knows these guys are/were both legends and leaders...

 

[huskers1217]

next year when Nebraska joins the big10 and they split the conference into two divisions they decided rather than using north and south or east and west as names, theyre going to go with "legends" and "leaders"... thoughts?

rep for you. i thought you were a looney until I found out its true.

 

[awaz]

wow really? legends and leaders? thats horrific.

why not name them the 'big' and '10' divisions.. its not like the 'big 10' name makes (or even made) sense anyway?

 

[dare2be]

what's in a name? I'm more dismayed over the splitting of the conference in the first place.

 

[kenyg54]

Should just be "winners" and "losers"

 

[Winged_Wheel88]

Don't like splitting it up to begin with.

EDIT: What dare2be said.

 

[SLY]

College... pfft. College sports are too complicated. Players change too quickly, and theres just way too many goddamn teams (schools).

 

[trev0914]

yea i dont know if it could get any worse than "legends" v. "leaders".. i always want the big10 to be innovative, but not in this way.