- Thread starter
- #541
Bandit
RIP to the real Bandit
Oh you don't need to win anyway. Take one for the good of the league.That's fine, fair weather friends - - I'll be pulling for me. ....
Oh you don't need to win anyway. Take one for the good of the league.That's fine, fair weather friends - - I'll be pulling for me. ....
Hey, If I hadn't taken one in the shorts for the league last week - I'd be more on board with it. .... I hate 'losing streaks' - 2 constitutes a streak.Oh you don't need to win anyway. Take one for the good of the league.
Weird but it's kind of fun to be holding all these picks and rooting for X team to score big and Y team to punt away points. The draft is going to be a blast and if the draft goes like Bandit has listed, I may go RB then QB and collect those Clemson players. If I have both the 1.01 and 1.02 ( instead of the 1.03) I likely go RB RB. Been doing some research early this year and really looking forward to the draft.
For me, at this point, in a vacuum, its RB#1, QB #2, both of which are Tigers, and no one else is even close.Weird but it's kind of fun to be holding all these picks and rooting for X team to score big and Y team to punt away points. The draft is going to be a blast and if the draft goes like Bandit has listed, I may go RB then QB and collect those Clemson players. If I have both the 1.01 and 1.02 ( instead of the 1.03) I likely go RB RB. Been doing some research early this year and really looking forward to the draft.
He's still there to ensure a 0-16 record, then he gets the boot and the Jets draft Lawrence. They will be passing a bunch since they will be playing catch up every game. Good to know your passing on him and I can wait and draft him with monkeys pick.Well Scott and I already discussed it and we will not draft Trevor Lawrence in this league because we've killed every quarterback we've owned this year and we want him to survive until year 2. LOL. I just hope for his sake that it's not the Jets or if it is that Adam Gase is no longer there. How that guy still has a job is beyond me.
I'm also keeping a eye on another RB and he would fit the Seahawks really well.For me, at this point, in a vacuum, its RB#1, QB #2, both of which are Tigers, and no one else is even close.
Obviously tons can change, most notably landing spots. Like Bandit says, if Lawrence go to the Jets, under Base, maybe he falls (a lot)
Sometimes?? Lol.Since I no longer watch football (unless it's at Bandit's), I rely totally on my 'secret formula' to rack and stack 'um. .... so, obvious advantage to you guys on the 'eye test'. .... yet, I haven't done too poorly in rookie drafts. Guess sometimes looks can be deceiving in the transition from college to the pros.
I didn't just reject- I countered.@Yellow Fuzzies... Sam and I sent you an offer to reject.
Jacobs no longer iffy, but out..and TKO has Booker..how do ya like them road apples??
Shit..
Jacobs no longer iffy, but out..and TKO has Booker..how do ya like them road apples??
Shit..
Totally understand. Would be nice if there were a way to split the difference.I didn't just reject- I countered.
For the moment I'm holding out hope that CEH's "illness" keeps him from playing, so I can start Bell. If not, I'll likely double down on my Raiders passing attack vs the Jets sans Jacobs...might work, might be all Agholor and Booker...fockersWell if you think Bernard would be an upgrade, shoot me something.
Okay gotcha, just thought I'd throw it out there.For the moment I'm holding out hope that CEH's "illness" keeps him from playing, so I can start Bell. If not, I'll likely double down on my Raiders passing attack vs the Jets sans Jacobs...might work, might be all Agholor and Booker...fockers
Recountered @wilwhiteSending another version, @Yellow Fuzzies, just in case you see meaningful value there.