Game Thread: Nucks vs flames - something's gotta give

[puckhead]

Both the Canucks and Flames last won Dec 4. Vancouver and Calgary each had only 1L in prior 6 before slump


Nucks have beaten the flames 8 in a row, but the way they have been generating noffense lately ... tough to bet on them.

 

[mattola]

Funny thing is that it will most likely be an entertaining game..

 

[jstewismybastardson]

In laws are over so im gonna have to put the phone away and listen to mominlaw crush the canucks for the next 2and a half hours

Go garnacha de fuego go. ... Err go canucks go

 

[puckhead]

Funny thing is that it will most likely be an entertaining game..

Cheers: Engellund protected Dorsett's skull when they were going over
Jeers: those idiot green guys seem to be reproducing.

 

[puckhead]

oh, so THAT's how you score!



/uhhh, under review? how the fuck is that reviewable

 

[puckhead]

/uhhh, under review? how the fuck is that reviewable

Elliiot said they called the war room and were told it was not reviewable.
In other intermission news, Jackie Redmond looks fantastic.

 

[puckhead]

Higgins / Vey / Bonino may never score again.
where chances go to die

 

[puckhead]

Commentator: "both teams just want to safely steer this one home, to make sure they get the single point. Just no Mistakes"
Play-by-play: "And there's Bieksa with a highsticking penalty"

 

[puckhead]

yay, we suck slightly less than you!!

Tanev = rockstar

 

[dash]

Well, if nothing else, at least the question of adding someone for the playoffs has been answered.

 

[davnlaguna]

I was at a roller hockey game years ago. Some thing happened but they ruled it a "no goal"
It may be they were looking for a rule clarification.

 

[puckhead]

I was at a roller hockey game years ago. Some thing happened but they ruled it a "no goal"
It may be they were looking for a rule clarification.

What I gathered was:
weber touched the puck but was deemed to not have control of it. That part is not reviewable anyway.
The refs said to the Canucks that if the pass back to the point was deflected by a Canuck (it was not), then it would be no goal. I think that's the part they asked for a review on, but was told it was also not reviewable. War room confirmed it was not deflected for good measure.