I'd argue that social justice isn't real justice, though.
Another meaningless distinction. People live in groups. Thus 'social.' Therefore justice apples to people, thus social justice.
So unless you're talking justice for some monk living by himself on a mountaintop, all justice is by definition, social.
Dirty Harry saw systemic issues with the justice system worrying more about criminal's rights than victim's rights. So he acted to rectify that. Thus social justice.
In pretty much every Eastwood movie, he's a SJW.
AGAIN, conflict -------> resolution.
If it's a comedy, there's justice, if it's a tragedy, there's no justice. A bit oversimplified, but the point stands.